Comparison Overview

Mary Byron Project, Inc

VS

Sharp Tudhope Lawyers

Mary Byron Project, Inc

9901 Linn Station Rd, Louisville-Jefferson County, Kentucky, 40223, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Mary Byron thought the law would protect her. It didn't and she was viciously killed by an abusive ex-boyfriend she thought was in jail. Today there are still many like Mary, who seek protection from continuing intimate partner violence. At the Mary Byron Project, we believe the law should protect them and we strive to make sure it is doing so. The Mary Byron Project’s mission to enhance justice to end intimate partner violence includes assisting victims when their efforts at relief are unjustly thwarted and training professionals within the system in hopes of preventing unjust results in the first place.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Sharp Tudhope Lawyers

Level 4, 152 Devonport Road, Tauranga, NZ, 3110
Last Update: 2025-11-28

We are a full service law firm, providing our clients with expertise across the breadth of legal disciplines including commercial, litigation, employment, property, trusts, relationship property and estates. With a strong base of seven respected partners at the helm of the business, you can be assured you will have access to a highly skilled team of approachable and trusted lawyers who genuinely care about you.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 58
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mary-byron-project-inc.jpeg
Mary Byron Project, Inc
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sharp-tudhope-lawyers.jpeg
Sharp Tudhope Lawyers
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Mary Byron Project, Inc
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Sharp Tudhope Lawyers
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mary Byron Project, Inc in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sharp Tudhope Lawyers in 2025.

Incident History — Mary Byron Project, Inc (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mary Byron Project, Inc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Sharp Tudhope Lawyers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sharp Tudhope Lawyers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mary-byron-project-inc.jpeg
Mary Byron Project, Inc
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sharp-tudhope-lawyers.jpeg
Sharp Tudhope Lawyers
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Mary Byron Project, Inc company and Sharp Tudhope Lawyers company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Sharp Tudhope Lawyers company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Mary Byron Project, Inc company.

In the current year, Sharp Tudhope Lawyers company and Mary Byron Project, Inc company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Sharp Tudhope Lawyers company nor Mary Byron Project, Inc company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Sharp Tudhope Lawyers company nor Mary Byron Project, Inc company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Sharp Tudhope Lawyers company nor Mary Byron Project, Inc company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Mary Byron Project, Inc company nor Sharp Tudhope Lawyers company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Mary Byron Project, Inc nor Sharp Tudhope Lawyers holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Mary Byron Project, Inc company nor Sharp Tudhope Lawyers company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Sharp Tudhope Lawyers company employs more people globally than Mary Byron Project, Inc company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Mary Byron Project, Inc nor Sharp Tudhope Lawyers holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Mary Byron Project, Inc nor Sharp Tudhope Lawyers holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Mary Byron Project, Inc nor Sharp Tudhope Lawyers holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Mary Byron Project, Inc nor Sharp Tudhope Lawyers holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Mary Byron Project, Inc nor Sharp Tudhope Lawyers holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Mary Byron Project, Inc nor Sharp Tudhope Lawyers holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X