Comparison Overview

Marvaco

VS

Total Design

Marvaco

Kumpulantie 3, Helsinki, Southern Finland, FI, 00520
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

MARVACO – Solution provider for packaging printers and brand owners. Our mission is to serve packaging printers and brand owners by providing cost efficient and high quality solutions which boost our customers performance. As our customer you can rely on our wide knowledge and long experience in packaging printing industry to create effective packaging. Our services: Printing Tools Adaptation Services Process Efficiency Strategic Design Technical Consulting Digital Portal

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 24
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Total Design

Total Design, London, N2 9DB, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 800 and 849

Total Design started with a simple compelling vision: to build a design consultancy, that takes a considered and structured approach, whilst creatively bringing brand values and vision to life. As a full service agency we work seamlessly across a multitude of disciplines. We have worked in a range of sectors - Sporting, Hospitality, Construction, Healthcare, Motor, Property and Telecommunications. Total Design has successfully delivered over 50 major events including 5 Ryder Cup home matches, The Hong Kong Open, The Eurasia Cup, 5 European Tour Players awards. Our clients range from large organisations to small corporate companies, who appreciate our responsive approach. Total Design’s team brings a wealth of experience and diverse knowledge. We believe in sharing that knowledge openly with our clients, suppliers and fellow creatives, enabling us to collaborate, feed off each other's passions and look for opportunities to truly create something amazing together.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 41
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/marvaco-oy.jpeg
Marvaco
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/total-design.jpeg
Total Design
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Marvaco
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Total Design
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Marvaco in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Total Design in 2025.

Incident History — Marvaco (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Marvaco cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Total Design (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Total Design cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/marvaco-oy.jpeg
Marvaco
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/total-design.jpeg
Total Design
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Total Design company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Marvaco company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Total Design company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Marvaco company.

In the current year, Total Design company and Marvaco company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Total Design company nor Marvaco company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Total Design company nor Marvaco company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Total Design company nor Marvaco company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Marvaco company nor Total Design company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Marvaco nor Total Design holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Marvaco company nor Total Design company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Total Design company employs more people globally than Marvaco company, reflecting its scale as a Graphic Design.

Neither Marvaco nor Total Design holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Marvaco nor Total Design holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Marvaco nor Total Design holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Marvaco nor Total Design holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Marvaco nor Total Design holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Marvaco nor Total Design holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X