Comparison Overview

Martin Furniture

VS

Zenbooth

Martin Furniture

2345 Britannia Blvd, San Diego, California, 92154, US
Last Update: 2025-11-25

Martin Furniture celebrates over 40 years as an international wholesale furniture manufacturer and distributor. Martin is a leader in residential and commercial office furniture, in addition to home entertainment and accent furniture. With manufacturing operations in North America, and manufacturing partnerships in SE Asia, Martin is able to provide speed of delivery and flexibility to its customers through direct container shipments and deliver services out of its San Diego, CA warehouse. Martin delivers exceptional value by combining old world craftsmanship, with fashion forward designs, and impeccable quality. Its products can be found through a variety of sales channels that include traditional furniture retailers, eCommerce, Club Stores, and Commercial Office Dealers. Headquartered in San Diego, CA, Martin Furniture employs more than 500 people globally.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 42
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Zenbooth

650 University Ave, Berkeley, California, 94710, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

We are Zenbooth. Zenbooth is the first American company dedicated to creating quiet spaces in the workplace. The Zenbooth is a private, quiet, eco-friendly and comfortable booth the provides people a space to make phone calls, focus and be productive. We service: B2B tech-startups (Cibo Technologies), technology companies (Lyft) and co-working spaces (Eco-Systm). You can find out more here: www.zenbooth.net Our community: CEO, COO, Founders, Business Managers, Marketing Directors, Sales Directors, Human Resources, and those that care about workplace environment and employee health. Chat with someone: [email protected]

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition: Furniture and Related Product Manufacturing
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/martin-furniture.jpeg
Martin Furniture
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/zenbooth.jpeg
Zenbooth
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Martin Furniture
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Zenbooth
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Martin Furniture in 2025.

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Zenbooth in 2025.

Incident History — Martin Furniture (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Martin Furniture cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Zenbooth (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Zenbooth cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/martin-furniture.jpeg
Martin Furniture
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/zenbooth.jpeg
Zenbooth
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Martin Furniture company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Zenbooth company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Zenbooth company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Martin Furniture company.

In the current year, Zenbooth company and Martin Furniture company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Zenbooth company nor Martin Furniture company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Zenbooth company nor Martin Furniture company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Zenbooth company nor Martin Furniture company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Martin Furniture company nor Zenbooth company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Martin Furniture nor Zenbooth holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Martin Furniture company nor Zenbooth company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Martin Furniture company employs more people globally than Zenbooth company, reflecting its scale as a Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing.

Neither Martin Furniture nor Zenbooth holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Martin Furniture nor Zenbooth holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Martin Furniture nor Zenbooth holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Martin Furniture nor Zenbooth holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Martin Furniture nor Zenbooth holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Martin Furniture nor Zenbooth holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.