Comparison Overview

Marsh Risk

VS

Vienna Insurance Group (VIG)

Marsh Risk

1166 Avenue of the Americas, New York, New York, US, 10036
Last Update: 2026-01-22
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.marsh.com

We help our clients and colleagues grow — and our communities thrive — by protecting and promoting possibility. We seek better ways to manage risk and define more effective paths to the right outcome. We go beyond risk to rewards for our clients, our company, our colleagues, and the communities in which we serve. Marsh Risk is a part of Marsh. Together with Mercer, Guy Carpenter, and Oliver Wyman, we help organizations build resilience and competitive advantages from every angle. With annual revenue over $24 billion and more than 90,000 colleagues in 130 countries, Marsh helps build the confidence to thrive through the power of perspective.

NAICS: 524
NAICS Definition: Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees: 26,578
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Vienna Insurance Group (VIG)

Schottenring 30, Vienna, 1010, AT
Last Update: 2026-01-17
Between 750 and 799
https://group.vig/

Vienna Insurance Group (VIG) is the leading insurance group in the entire Central and Eastern European (CEE) region. More than 50 insurance companies and pension funds in 30 countries form a Group with a long-standing tradition, strong brands and close customer relations. Around 30,000 employees in the VIG take care of the day-to-day needs of around 33 million customers. VIG shares have been listed on the Vienna Stock Exchange since 1994, on the Prague Stock Exchange since 2008 and on the Budapest Stock Exchange since 2022. The VIG Group has an A+ rating with a positive outlook by the internationally recognised rating agency Standard & Poor’s. VIG cooperates closely with the Erste Group, the largest retail bank in Central and Eastern Europe. VIG Social Media Netiquette: https://group.vig/en/social-media-netiquette/

NAICS: 524
NAICS Definition: Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees: 17,025
Subsidiaries: 41
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/marshrisk.jpeg
Marsh Risk
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/vienna-insurance-group.jpeg
Vienna Insurance Group (VIG)
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Marsh Risk
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Vienna Insurance Group (VIG)
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Marsh Risk in 2026.

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Vienna Insurance Group (VIG) in 2026.

Incident History — Marsh Risk (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Marsh Risk cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Vienna Insurance Group (VIG) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Vienna Insurance Group (VIG) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/marshrisk.jpeg
Marsh Risk
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/vienna-insurance-group.jpeg
Vienna Insurance Group (VIG)
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Marsh Risk company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Vienna Insurance Group (VIG) company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Vienna Insurance Group (VIG) company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Marsh Risk company.

In the current year, Vienna Insurance Group (VIG) company and Marsh Risk company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Vienna Insurance Group (VIG) company nor Marsh Risk company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Vienna Insurance Group (VIG) company nor Marsh Risk company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Vienna Insurance Group (VIG) company nor Marsh Risk company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Marsh Risk company nor Vienna Insurance Group (VIG) company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Marsh Risk nor Vienna Insurance Group (VIG) holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Vienna Insurance Group (VIG) company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Marsh Risk company.

Marsh Risk company employs more people globally than Vienna Insurance Group (VIG) company, reflecting its scale as a Insurance.

Neither Marsh Risk nor Vienna Insurance Group (VIG) holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Marsh Risk nor Vienna Insurance Group (VIG) holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Marsh Risk nor Vienna Insurance Group (VIG) holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Marsh Risk nor Vienna Insurance Group (VIG) holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Marsh Risk nor Vienna Insurance Group (VIG) holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Marsh Risk nor Vienna Insurance Group (VIG) holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References