Comparison Overview

Marsh Risk

VS

Humana

Marsh Risk

1166 Avenue of the Americas, New York, New York, US, 10036
Last Update: 2026-01-22
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.marsh.com

We help our clients and colleagues grow — and our communities thrive — by protecting and promoting possibility. We seek better ways to manage risk and define more effective paths to the right outcome. We go beyond risk to rewards for our clients, our company, our colleagues, and the communities in which we serve. Marsh Risk is a part of Marsh. Together with Mercer, Guy Carpenter, and Oliver Wyman, we help organizations build resilience and competitive advantages from every angle. With annual revenue over $24 billion and more than 90,000 colleagues in 130 countries, Marsh helps build the confidence to thrive through the power of perspective.

NAICS: 524
NAICS Definition: Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees: 26,578
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Humana

500 W Main St, Louisville, US
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 650 and 699
https://careers.humana.com/

Humana will never ask, nor require a candidate to provide money for work equipment and network access during the application process. If you become aware of any instances where you as a candidate are asked to provide information and do not believe it is a legitimate request from Humana or affiliate, please contact [email protected] to validate the request At Humana, our cultural foundation is aligned to helping members achieve their best health by delivering personalized, simplified, whole-person healthcare experiences. Recognizing healthcare needs continue to evolve for each person, for each family and for each community, Humana continuously creates innovative solutions and resources that help people live their healthiest lives on their terms –when and where they need it. Our employees are at the heart of making this happen and that’s why we are dedicated to building an organization of dynamic talent whose experience and passion center on putting the customer first.

NAICS: 524
NAICS Definition: Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees: 46,895
Subsidiaries: 6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
5
Attack type number
3

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/marshrisk.jpeg
Marsh Risk
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/humana.jpeg
Humana
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Marsh Risk
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Humana
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Marsh Risk in 2026.

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Humana in 2026.

Incident History — Marsh Risk (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Marsh Risk cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Humana (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Humana cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/marshrisk.jpeg
Marsh Risk
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/humana.jpeg
Humana
Incidents

Date Detected: 8/2023
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 5/2023
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 09/2022
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Marsh Risk company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Humana company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Humana company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Marsh Risk company has not reported any.

In the current year, Humana company and Marsh Risk company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Humana company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Marsh Risk company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Humana company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Marsh Risk company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Humana company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Marsh Risk company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Marsh Risk company nor Humana company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Marsh Risk nor Humana holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Humana company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Marsh Risk company.

Humana company employs more people globally than Marsh Risk company, reflecting its scale as a Insurance.

Neither Marsh Risk nor Humana holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Marsh Risk nor Humana holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Marsh Risk nor Humana holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Marsh Risk nor Humana holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Marsh Risk nor Humana holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Marsh Risk nor Humana holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References