Comparison Overview

Marshall & Bruce Printing Company

VS

Anupam Art Printers

Marshall & Bruce Printing Company

689 Davidson Street, Nashville, TN, 37213, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.marbruco.com

Since our founding in 1865, Marshall & Bruce has become one of the nation’s leading printing and fulfillment companies. A lot has changed in the industry since we first opened our doors in Nashville, and we have led the way by continually reinvesting in the latest technology. Marshall & Bruce now offers a wide range of capabilities to serve customers across the country. Today, we’re an agile, responsive, 24/7 operation, with over 100,000 square feet of manufacturing, printing, and warehousing facilities. Each of our presses is UV-equipped, allowing printing on a variety of synthetics, including plastics and vinyl. Marshall & Bruce offers high-quality marketing materials, retail packaging, large-format POP displays & signage, as well as a wide variety of other specialty printed items.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 46
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Anupam Art Printers

None
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799
http://www.anupamartprinters.com

Anupam Art Printers- A firm, that has proved to be the best in the industry for more than three decades, welcomes you to a new world of Offset printing with its upcoming launch of two brand new machines. Anupam Art Printers since its inception in 1972 has built a strong and loyal clientele. We believe in performing to our best by learning from our past experiences so as to cultivate our potentials for a better tomorrow. Our quality & commitment go hand in hand ensuring that our clients get not just what is promised, but also what is desired. We look at technology addition as a part of our growth. We match up with the International Quality standards and are fully equipped to sail out in the International Market.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 17
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/marshall-&-bruce-printing-company.jpeg
Marshall & Bruce Printing Company
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Anupam Art Printers
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Marshall & Bruce Printing Company
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Anupam Art Printers
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Marshall & Bruce Printing Company in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Anupam Art Printers in 2025.

Incident History — Marshall & Bruce Printing Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Marshall & Bruce Printing Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Anupam Art Printers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Anupam Art Printers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/marshall-&-bruce-printing-company.jpeg
Marshall & Bruce Printing Company
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Anupam Art Printers
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Anupam Art Printers company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Marshall & Bruce Printing Company company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Anupam Art Printers company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Marshall & Bruce Printing Company company.

In the current year, Anupam Art Printers company and Marshall & Bruce Printing Company company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Anupam Art Printers company nor Marshall & Bruce Printing Company company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Anupam Art Printers company nor Marshall & Bruce Printing Company company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Anupam Art Printers company nor Marshall & Bruce Printing Company company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Marshall & Bruce Printing Company company nor Anupam Art Printers company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Marshall & Bruce Printing Company nor Anupam Art Printers holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Marshall & Bruce Printing Company company nor Anupam Art Printers company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Marshall & Bruce Printing Company company employs more people globally than Anupam Art Printers company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Marshall & Bruce Printing Company nor Anupam Art Printers holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Marshall & Bruce Printing Company nor Anupam Art Printers holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Marshall & Bruce Printing Company nor Anupam Art Printers holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Marshall & Bruce Printing Company nor Anupam Art Printers holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Marshall & Bruce Printing Company nor Anupam Art Printers holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Marshall & Bruce Printing Company nor Anupam Art Printers holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References