Comparison Overview

Marsh McLennan Agency

VS

Sedgwick

Marsh McLennan Agency

360 Hamilton Ave, White Plains, New York, US
Last Update: 2025-12-09
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.marshmma.com/

Marsh McLennan Agency (MMA) provides business insurance, employee health & benefits, retirement & wealth, and private client insurance solutions to organizations and individuals seeking limitless possibilities. With over 15,000+ colleagues and 300+ offices across the United States and Canada, MMA combines the personalized service model of a local consultant with the global resources and expertise of the world’s leading professional services firm, Marsh McLennan (NYSE: MMC). MMA generates more than $5 billion in annualized revenue, making it one of the largest brokerage operations in North America.

NAICS: 524
NAICS Definition: Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees: 14,428
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
View Profile

Sedgwick

US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799
https://www.sedgwick.com

Sedgwick is the world’s leading risk and claims administration partner, helping clients thrive by navigating the unexpected. The company’s expertise, combined with the most advanced AI-enabled technology available, sets the standard for solutions in claims administration, loss adjusting, benefits administration and product recall. With over 33,000 colleagues and 10,000 clients across 80 countries, Sedgwick provides unmatched perspective, caring that counts, and solutions for the rapidly changing and complex risk landscape.

NAICS: 524
NAICS Definition: Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees: 21,657
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/marsh-mclennan-agency.jpeg
Marsh McLennan Agency
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sedgwick.jpeg
Sedgwick
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Marsh McLennan Agency
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Sedgwick
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Marsh McLennan Agency in 2025.

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sedgwick in 2025.

Incident History — Marsh McLennan Agency (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Marsh McLennan Agency cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Sedgwick (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sedgwick cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/marsh-mclennan-agency.jpeg
Marsh McLennan Agency
Incidents

Date Detected: 3/2021
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sedgwick.jpeg
Sedgwick
Incidents

Date Detected: 7/2020
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Sedgwick company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Marsh McLennan Agency company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Marsh McLennan Agency and Sedgwick have experienced a similar number of publicly disclosed cyber incidents.

In the current year, Sedgwick company and Marsh McLennan Agency company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Sedgwick company nor Marsh McLennan Agency company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Both Sedgwick company and Marsh McLennan Agency company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

Neither Sedgwick company nor Marsh McLennan Agency company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Marsh McLennan Agency company nor Sedgwick company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Marsh McLennan Agency nor Sedgwick holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Marsh McLennan Agency company nor Sedgwick company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Sedgwick company employs more people globally than Marsh McLennan Agency company, reflecting its scale as a Insurance.

Neither Marsh McLennan Agency nor Sedgwick holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Marsh McLennan Agency nor Sedgwick holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Marsh McLennan Agency nor Sedgwick holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Marsh McLennan Agency nor Sedgwick holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Marsh McLennan Agency nor Sedgwick holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Marsh McLennan Agency nor Sedgwick holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References