Comparison Overview

Marlow Connell Abrams Adler Newman & Lewis

VS

Furey, Furey, Leverage & Darlington, P.C.

Marlow Connell Abrams Adler Newman & Lewis

4000 Ponce de Leon Blvd, Coral Gables, 33146, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Marlow, Connell, Abrams, Adler, Newman & Lewis, founded in 1956, offers its clients extensive experience and a proven track record in representing the full range of defense and litigation claims throughout Florida and the U.S. Virgin Islands while upholding the highest professional and ethical standards. With over 50 years litigation experience, Marlow Connell’s team of seasoned attorneys has the knowledge and capabilities required to ensure successful outcomes in handling defense claims across an impressive spectrum of practice areas, doing so with superior dedication and discretion. The firm represents professionals, manufacturers, employers, corporations, businesses, insurance companies and third party administrators.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 48
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Furey, Furey, Leverage & Darlington, P.C.

600 Front St, Hempstead, 11550, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Furey, Furey, Leverage, Manzione & Darlington, P.C. was founded in 1968. Our practice covers all aspects of civil defense litigation with a primary concentration in medical malpractice defense litigation. Through the years we have successfully defended physicians in all specialties of medicine, as well as hospitals, nursing homes, nurses, podiatrists, physician assistants and dentists. We are also skilled in defending claims involving premises liability, elevator accidents, sexual harassment, Labor Law, construction accidents, products liability and automobile liability. Our partners and associates have distinguished themselves as expert civil litigators, and the firm is regarded as one of the preeminent litigation firms in the region. Our primary area of practice is insurance defense, with concentration in high exposure claims of medical and professional malpractice, nursing home litigation, and general commercial liability, including premises and automobile liability, construction site accidents, and defective products. We have also handled cases involving elevator and escalator actions, employment related personal injury such as sexual harassment, wrongful termination and defamation. Our practice has also handled insurance coverage claims, including resolution of priority of multiple insurance policies, disclaimers, anti-subrogation and litigation of policy provisions and exclusions. We also represent medical professionals in investigations conducted by the Office of Professional Medical Conduct (OPMC) and the Office of Professional Discipline (OPD). We have offices in Nassau and Suffolk County as well as Sullivan County in Central New York. Our main office is located in central Nassau County, Long Island New York, minutes from the New York Supreme Court in Mineola, and the New York State District Court in Hempstead.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 21
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Marlow Connell Abrams Adler Newman & Lewis
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Furey, Furey, Leverage & Darlington, P.C.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Marlow Connell Abrams Adler Newman & Lewis
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Furey, Furey, Leverage & Darlington, P.C.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Marlow Connell Abrams Adler Newman & Lewis in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Furey, Furey, Leverage & Darlington, P.C. in 2025.

Incident History — Marlow Connell Abrams Adler Newman & Lewis (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Marlow Connell Abrams Adler Newman & Lewis cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Furey, Furey, Leverage & Darlington, P.C. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Furey, Furey, Leverage & Darlington, P.C. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Marlow Connell Abrams Adler Newman & Lewis
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Furey, Furey, Leverage & Darlington, P.C.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Furey, Furey, Leverage & Darlington, P.C. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Marlow Connell Abrams Adler Newman & Lewis company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Furey, Furey, Leverage & Darlington, P.C. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Marlow Connell Abrams Adler Newman & Lewis company.

In the current year, Furey, Furey, Leverage & Darlington, P.C. company and Marlow Connell Abrams Adler Newman & Lewis company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Furey, Furey, Leverage & Darlington, P.C. company nor Marlow Connell Abrams Adler Newman & Lewis company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Furey, Furey, Leverage & Darlington, P.C. company nor Marlow Connell Abrams Adler Newman & Lewis company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Furey, Furey, Leverage & Darlington, P.C. company nor Marlow Connell Abrams Adler Newman & Lewis company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Marlow Connell Abrams Adler Newman & Lewis company nor Furey, Furey, Leverage & Darlington, P.C. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Marlow Connell Abrams Adler Newman & Lewis nor Furey, Furey, Leverage & Darlington, P.C. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Marlow Connell Abrams Adler Newman & Lewis company nor Furey, Furey, Leverage & Darlington, P.C. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Marlow Connell Abrams Adler Newman & Lewis company employs more people globally than Furey, Furey, Leverage & Darlington, P.C. company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Marlow Connell Abrams Adler Newman & Lewis nor Furey, Furey, Leverage & Darlington, P.C. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Marlow Connell Abrams Adler Newman & Lewis nor Furey, Furey, Leverage & Darlington, P.C. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Marlow Connell Abrams Adler Newman & Lewis nor Furey, Furey, Leverage & Darlington, P.C. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Marlow Connell Abrams Adler Newman & Lewis nor Furey, Furey, Leverage & Darlington, P.C. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Marlow Connell Abrams Adler Newman & Lewis nor Furey, Furey, Leverage & Darlington, P.C. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Marlow Connell Abrams Adler Newman & Lewis nor Furey, Furey, Leverage & Darlington, P.C. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X