Comparison Overview

Marlane Graphics

VS

Prestige Printing & FASTSIGNS

Marlane Graphics

1526 S Valley Forge Rd, Worcester Township, Pennsylvania, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://marlanegraphics.com

Marlane Graphics provides the best in printing, graphic design and promotional marketing services for many customers across the country. Marlane Graphics was founded in 1987 by Dan Spinelli a Temple University graduate who was interested in starting his own printing company. A family-owned business since its first day, we have won numerous customer service awards because we believe that service and great product will always be what a customer needs and deserves.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Prestige Printing & FASTSIGNS

1307 12th Street, Columbus, IN, 47201, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
http://www.prestigeteam.biz

Prestige Printing & Fastsigns is a full service printer and marketing agency, which means we can do just about anything. In addition to printing we provide the following services to help you complete your project. We're so much more... just look at all we can do! - Blueprint Copies - Booklet Binding - Collating - Custom Printing - Cutting - Design & Document Creation - Die Cutting - Dimensional Lettering - Direct Mail Strategies - Drilling Holes - Effective Mainstream Media Placement and Creative Services - Foam Board Mounting - Folding - Frosted Vinyl - Laminating - LED Signage - Litigation Support Services - Logo Creation - Mailing Services - Marketing including Internet Marketing and Creative Services - Numbering - Perforation - Production Printing - Raised Printing - Rounded Corners - Scanning - Scoring and Slitting - Shipping and Delivery - Shrink Wrapping - Specialty Marketing - Stapling - Strategic and Specialty Marketing Services - Variable Data Printing - Vinyl Graphics - Vehicle Graphics And so much more!

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/marlane-graphics.jpeg
Marlane Graphics
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/prestige-printing.jpeg
Prestige Printing & FASTSIGNS
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Marlane Graphics
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Prestige Printing & FASTSIGNS
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Marlane Graphics in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Prestige Printing & FASTSIGNS in 2025.

Incident History — Marlane Graphics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Marlane Graphics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Prestige Printing & FASTSIGNS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Prestige Printing & FASTSIGNS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/marlane-graphics.jpeg
Marlane Graphics
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/prestige-printing.jpeg
Prestige Printing & FASTSIGNS
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Marlane Graphics company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Prestige Printing & FASTSIGNS company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Prestige Printing & FASTSIGNS company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Marlane Graphics company.

In the current year, Prestige Printing & FASTSIGNS company and Marlane Graphics company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Prestige Printing & FASTSIGNS company nor Marlane Graphics company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Prestige Printing & FASTSIGNS company nor Marlane Graphics company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Prestige Printing & FASTSIGNS company nor Marlane Graphics company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Marlane Graphics company nor Prestige Printing & FASTSIGNS company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Marlane Graphics nor Prestige Printing & FASTSIGNS holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Marlane Graphics company nor Prestige Printing & FASTSIGNS company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Prestige Printing & FASTSIGNS company employs more people globally than Marlane Graphics company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Marlane Graphics nor Prestige Printing & FASTSIGNS holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Marlane Graphics nor Prestige Printing & FASTSIGNS holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Marlane Graphics nor Prestige Printing & FASTSIGNS holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Marlane Graphics nor Prestige Printing & FASTSIGNS holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Marlane Graphics nor Prestige Printing & FASTSIGNS holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Marlane Graphics nor Prestige Printing & FASTSIGNS holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References