Comparison Overview

Marlane Graphics

VS

Holland 1916

Marlane Graphics

1526 S Valley Forge Rd, Worcester Township, Pennsylvania, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Marlane Graphics provides the best in printing, graphic design and promotional marketing services for many customers across the country. Marlane Graphics was founded in 1987 by Dan Spinelli a Temple University graduate who was interested in starting his own printing company. A family-owned business since its first day, we have won numerous customer service awards because we believe that service and great product will always be what a customer needs and deserves.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Holland 1916

1300 Burlington, North Kansas City, 64116, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Veteran Owned and Operated Since our founding in 1916, customers have relied upon Holland 1916 Inc. to manufacture quality identification products to convey branding, operating and safety information. Through the years we have, based upon customer needs, expanded our product line. Recently, we organized ourselves into a parent company, Holland 1916 Inc., and two operating companies: - Holland Nameplate Inc.: a manufacturer of nameplates and durable RFID products - Holland Interface Solutions Inc.: a manufacturer of custom touchscreens, keypads, displays, graphic overlays, and other rugged interface products The introduction of separate operating companies allows our teams to respond even faster and to develop new products more rapidly. Please contact our team of professionals to determine how we can assist you in selecting the ideal solution for your application

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 75
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/marlane-graphics.jpeg
Marlane Graphics
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/holland-1916.jpeg
Holland 1916
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Marlane Graphics
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Holland 1916
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Marlane Graphics in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Holland 1916 in 2025.

Incident History — Marlane Graphics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Marlane Graphics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Holland 1916 (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Holland 1916 cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/marlane-graphics.jpeg
Marlane Graphics
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/holland-1916.jpeg
Holland 1916
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Marlane Graphics company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Holland 1916 company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Holland 1916 company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Marlane Graphics company.

In the current year, Holland 1916 company and Marlane Graphics company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Holland 1916 company nor Marlane Graphics company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Holland 1916 company nor Marlane Graphics company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Holland 1916 company nor Marlane Graphics company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Marlane Graphics company nor Holland 1916 company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Marlane Graphics nor Holland 1916 holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Holland 1916 company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Marlane Graphics company.

Holland 1916 company employs more people globally than Marlane Graphics company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Marlane Graphics nor Holland 1916 holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Marlane Graphics nor Holland 1916 holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Marlane Graphics nor Holland 1916 holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Marlane Graphics nor Holland 1916 holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Marlane Graphics nor Holland 1916 holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Marlane Graphics nor Holland 1916 holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N