Comparison Overview

Mohn Marketing

VS

Royal Columbian Hospital Foundation

Mohn Marketing

Main Street, Coeur d'Alene, ID, 83814, US
Last Update: 2025-12-20
Between 750 and 799

Mohn Marketing provides development, messaging and community awareness services to corporations, foundations & non-profits. Marks Mohn Associates serves Northern California. Mohn Marketing works with public benefit campaigns and charities to improve sustainability, broaden community outreach and expand donor participation. In addition, Mohn Marketing works with Foundations and Corporations crafting effective cause marketing promotions and charity sponsorships to broaden consumer awareness and reinforce corporate missions.

NAICS: 561
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Royal Columbian Hospital Foundation

330 E Columbia St, New Westminster, British Columbia, V3L 3W7, CA
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Building on a strong tradition of caring and community support, Royal Columbian Hospital Foundation (RCHF) was established in 1978 to raise funds for the hospital’s first CT Scanner. For more than thirty years, the mission of RCHF has been to raise money to help the hospital save lives, restore health and provide comfort to seriously injured and ill patients of all ages. Today, RCHF is an independent charitable organization that raises millions of dollars each year to fund major projects, priority equipment needs, facility enhancements, research, education and innovation at RCH. Thousands of individuals, businesses, community groups and foundations in surrounding communities and across the region provide generous support to help RCHF achieve its vision — to inspire giving and grow funding so patients have access to the best in health care at Royal Columbian Hospital. Charitable Registration Number: 11912 8866 RR0001

NAICS: 561499
NAICS Definition: All Other Business Support Services
Employees: 226
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/marks-mohn-associates.jpeg
Mohn Marketing
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rchfoundation.jpeg
Royal Columbian Hospital Foundation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Mohn Marketing
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Royal Columbian Hospital Foundation
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Fundraising Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mohn Marketing in 2025.

Incidents vs Fundraising Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Royal Columbian Hospital Foundation in 2025.

Incident History — Mohn Marketing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mohn Marketing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Royal Columbian Hospital Foundation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Royal Columbian Hospital Foundation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/marks-mohn-associates.jpeg
Mohn Marketing
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rchfoundation.jpeg
Royal Columbian Hospital Foundation
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Mohn Marketing company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Royal Columbian Hospital Foundation company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Royal Columbian Hospital Foundation company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Mohn Marketing company.

In the current year, Royal Columbian Hospital Foundation company and Mohn Marketing company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Royal Columbian Hospital Foundation company nor Mohn Marketing company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Royal Columbian Hospital Foundation company nor Mohn Marketing company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Royal Columbian Hospital Foundation company nor Mohn Marketing company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Mohn Marketing company nor Royal Columbian Hospital Foundation company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Mohn Marketing nor Royal Columbian Hospital Foundation holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Mohn Marketing company nor Royal Columbian Hospital Foundation company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Royal Columbian Hospital Foundation company employs more people globally than Mohn Marketing company, reflecting its scale as a Fundraising.

Neither Mohn Marketing nor Royal Columbian Hospital Foundation holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Mohn Marketing nor Royal Columbian Hospital Foundation holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Mohn Marketing nor Royal Columbian Hospital Foundation holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Mohn Marketing nor Royal Columbian Hospital Foundation holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Mohn Marketing nor Royal Columbian Hospital Foundation holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Mohn Marketing nor Royal Columbian Hospital Foundation holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Versa SASE Client for Windows versions released between 7.8.7 and 7.9.4 contain a local privilege escalation vulnerability in the audit log export functionality. The client communicates user-controlled file paths to a privileged service, which performs file system operations without impersonating the requesting user. Due to improper privilege handling and a time-of-check time-of-use race condition combined with symbolic link and mount point manipulation, a local authenticated attacker can coerce the service into deleting arbitrary directories with SYSTEM privileges. This can be exploited to delete protected system folders such as C:\\Config.msi and subsequently achieve execution as NT AUTHORITY\\SYSTEM via MSI rollback techniques.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' function in all versions up to, and including, 7.7. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to inject cross-site scripting into the 'status' parameter of applied jobs for any user.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 7.7 via the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to send a site-generated email with injected HTML to any user.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Description

The FiboSearch – Ajax Search for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the plugin's `thegem_te_search` shortcode in all versions up to, and including, 1.32.0 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on user supplied attributes. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. This vulnerability requires TheGem theme (premium) to be installed with Header Builder mode enabled, and the FiboSearch "Replace search bars" option enabled for TheGem integration.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

The Ultimate Member – User Profile, Registration, Login, Member Directory, Content Restriction & Membership Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 2.11.0 via the ajax_get_members function. This is due to the use of a predictable low-entropy token (5 hex characters derived from md5 of post ID) to identify member directories and insufficient authorization checks on the unauthenticated AJAX endpoint. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract sensitive data including usernames, display names, user roles (including administrator accounts), profile URLs, and user IDs by enumerating predictable directory_id values or brute-forcing the small 16^5 token space.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N