Comparison Overview

Markow Walker, P.A.

VS

BASTA, Inc.

Markow Walker, P.A.

599 Highland Colony Pkwy, Ridgeland, Mississippi, 39157, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

From its beginning as a three-person law firm in 1984, the goal at Markow Walker has been to provide professional legal services that were both personal and specifically tailored to meet the unique needs of our clients. With that goal in mind, Markow Walker has expanded by hiring lawyers with not only similar philosophies concerning the servicing of clients, but who are compatible both from individual personalities and ethical convictions. This has had the effect of developing a team approach to achieving the highest expertise to providing quality service to our clients. Although no longer one of the smaller firms in Mississippi, the lawyers at Markow Walker continue to strive to maintain that level of personal service despite the growth in its litigation team, areas of practice and client base.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 31
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

BASTA, Inc.

1545 Wilshire Blvd, Los Angeles, California, 90017, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

BASTA is more than a non-profit organization. We are about revolution! In the past 15+ years, BASTA has grown to being one of the largest housing rights non-profit organizations in Southern California that provides direct legal representation to low-income tenants. We have four full-service offices, nearly 20 attorneys, and boast many published cases where BASTA attorneys changed the law. We pioneered the right to a jury trial for eviction matters, a right now regularly invoked across the entire State by tenants facing potential eviction and homelessness. BASTA is a multi-faceted legal services provider that affirmatively seeks justice through mass action impact litigation, high volume eviction defense, and other affirmative individual lawsuits. We believe housing is a human right and are a founding member of the County of Los Angeles’ Right to Counsel Coalition.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 21
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/markowwalkerpa.jpeg
Markow Walker, P.A.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/basta-inc..jpeg
BASTA, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Markow Walker, P.A.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
BASTA, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Markow Walker, P.A. in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BASTA, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — Markow Walker, P.A. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Markow Walker, P.A. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — BASTA, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BASTA, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/markowwalkerpa.jpeg
Markow Walker, P.A.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/basta-inc..jpeg
BASTA, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Markow Walker, P.A. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to BASTA, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, BASTA, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Markow Walker, P.A. company.

In the current year, BASTA, Inc. company and Markow Walker, P.A. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither BASTA, Inc. company nor Markow Walker, P.A. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither BASTA, Inc. company nor Markow Walker, P.A. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither BASTA, Inc. company nor Markow Walker, P.A. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Markow Walker, P.A. company nor BASTA, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Markow Walker, P.A. nor BASTA, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Markow Walker, P.A. company nor BASTA, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Markow Walker, P.A. company employs more people globally than BASTA, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Markow Walker, P.A. nor BASTA, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Markow Walker, P.A. nor BASTA, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Markow Walker, P.A. nor BASTA, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Markow Walker, P.A. nor BASTA, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Markow Walker, P.A. nor BASTA, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Markow Walker, P.A. nor BASTA, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X