Comparison Overview

Mark-it Graphics

VS

Amber Signs & Print

Mark-it Graphics

3033 University Avenue SE, Minneapolis, MN, 55414, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.mark-itgraphics.com

For over thirty years, Mark-It Graphics has been providing quality products and service to leading companies around the world. Our attention to quality and customer service has helped us earn our reputation as the supplier of choice. Our main production facility is located in Osceola, Wisconsin with sales headquarters located in Minneapolis and Chicago. We have a solid work force with excellent integrity and work ethic. Our management team has over sixty years combined experience in custom graphics and fabrication. We plan to continue our growth by providing our customers with quality products and exceptional service!

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Amber Signs & Print

59 Gossoms End, Berkhamsted, Hertfordshire, HP4 1DF, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ambersigns.com/

Welcome To Amber Signs & Print of Hertfordshire Amber Signs and Print is a well established Berkhamsted, Hertfordshire based business. We have experienced, skilled designers, graphic artists and fitters to look after all aspects of your of your project, from initial conception to final completion to the very highest standards. We pride ourselves on providing the full package for all sizes of company, whether it be branding and advertising for larger companies or complete corporate identity for new and fledgeling businesses, including fascias, vehicle livery and stationary. We aim to provide our expertise at very competitive prices and our portfolio shows our significant and diverse customer base, and why people keep coming back... Please take a minute to browse our website, and feel free to contact us for a quote.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mark-it-graphics.jpeg
Mark-it Graphics
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/amber-signs-print.jpeg
Amber Signs & Print
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Mark-it Graphics
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Amber Signs & Print
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mark-it Graphics in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Amber Signs & Print in 2025.

Incident History — Mark-it Graphics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mark-it Graphics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Amber Signs & Print (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Amber Signs & Print cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mark-it-graphics.jpeg
Mark-it Graphics
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/amber-signs-print.jpeg
Amber Signs & Print
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Amber Signs & Print company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Mark-it Graphics company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Amber Signs & Print company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Mark-it Graphics company.

In the current year, Amber Signs & Print company and Mark-it Graphics company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Amber Signs & Print company nor Mark-it Graphics company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Amber Signs & Print company nor Mark-it Graphics company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Amber Signs & Print company nor Mark-it Graphics company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Mark-it Graphics company nor Amber Signs & Print company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Mark-it Graphics nor Amber Signs & Print holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Mark-it Graphics company nor Amber Signs & Print company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Mark-it Graphics company employs more people globally than Amber Signs & Print company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Mark-it Graphics nor Amber Signs & Print holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Mark-it Graphics nor Amber Signs & Print holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Mark-it Graphics nor Amber Signs & Print holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Mark-it Graphics nor Amber Signs & Print holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Mark-it Graphics nor Amber Signs & Print holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Mark-it Graphics nor Amber Signs & Print holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References