Comparison Overview
Mark Anthony Group

Mark Anthony Group
None, None, Vancouver, British Columbia, CA, None
Last Update: 04/06/2026
The Mark Anthony Group of Companies is one of North America’s most diversified and successful private beverage companies focused on the alcohol beverage sector. Founded in 1972, the Company grew organically from a one-man wine importing business to a producer and distri...

Pernod Ricard
5 cour Paul Ricard, Paris, 75008, FR
Last Update: 13/07/2026
Pernod Ricard is a convivial, responsible and successful global wine and spirits group and the #1 premium spirits organisation in the world. The Group represents 240 premium brands available in more than 160 countries. We are 18,500 exceptionally talented people worldwi...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Mark Anthony Group







Pernod Ricard






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Beverage Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Mark Anthony Group in 2026.
Incidents vs Beverage Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Pernod Ricard in 2026.
Incident History - Mark Anthony Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Mark Anthony Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Pernod Ricard (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Pernod Ricard cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Mark Anthony Group

Pernod Ricard
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A vulnerability has been found in SourceCodester Simple Online Food Ordering System 1.0. This affects an unknown function of the file /admin/ajax.php?action=login2. The manipulation of the argument email leads to sql injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.
A flaw was found in the ipa_getkeytab module of the community.general Ansible collection. The module's bind_pw parameter, used to supply the LDAP simple-bind password when retrieving a Kerberos keytab, is not declared with no_log, unlike the sibling password parameter in the same module. As a consequence, the supplied IPA/LDAP bind password is recorded in cleartext in the managed host's system journal/syslog (the module's "Invoked with" record), is included in the module's return values and verbose (-v) output, and is displayed in Automation Controller / AWX job output. The password is additionally passed on the command line to the ipa-getkeytab helper (as --bindpw <value>), exposing it in the process list to local users while the command runs. An attacker able to read these logs, job output, or the process table can obtain the directory bind credential, potentially compromising the accounts and objects that credential can access.
The device metadata import interface /device/instance/{productId}/property-metadata/import of jetlinks community 2.11 is vulnerable to Server-side request forgery (SSRF).
disconf (Distributed Configuration Management Platform) 2.6.36 is vulnerable to Incorrect Access Control. The config-fetching APIs /api/config/item, /api/config/file, /api/config/list and /api/config/simple/list are exposed without authentication. The LoginInterceptor explicitly whitelists these four paths, so any anonymous attacker can read every configuration item and configuration file managed by the config center.
Funiture 1.0.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the backend tool interfaces /sys/tool/select.json and /sys/tool/update.json.