Comparison Overview

Marine Accessories Corporation

VS

Sunice

Marine Accessories Corporation

412 N Cedar Bluff Rd, Knoxville, Tennessee, 37923, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26

Headquartered in Knoxville, Tennessee, Marine Accessories Corporation (MAC) is the parent company of leading brands in the tower and marine canvas segments including Xtreme Tower Products (XTP), Monster Tower, TurboSwing, Fishmaster, Great Lakes Boat Top, and Westland Industries. Each carefully chosen brand specializes in boating accessories that make watersports more fun and maximize boat protection. At Marine Accessories Corporation, our life is on the water. We are passionate about everything related to watercraft. It’s in our DNA, it’s in our blood, and it’s a part of everything we do. We believe that our award-winning products and services simply make boating better. That’s why we’ve assembled a host of strong, complementary brands to serve you. We know you and your lifestyle – we’re right there in the water with you. Marine Accessories Corporation is Boating Made Better™.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 16
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Sunice

None
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Committed to delivering top-quality actionwear, Sunice® is owned by The Fletcher Leisure Group of Canada. Sunice® is a performance-enhancing golf and ski outerwear brand that uses advanced technologies, fabrics and manufacturing methods. Sunice®, a longtime expert and leader in the technical outerwear industry, is dedicated to a unique concept of science and style. This is done by creating innovative design, using durable construction, and blending fashion-forward styling while using the latest in technical specialty fabrics. Fletcher Leisure Group, based in Montreal, Quebec, is a company with 42 years of golf industry experience marketing multiple brands in Canada and the United States.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 41
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/marine-accessories-corp.jpeg
Marine Accessories Corporation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sunice.jpeg
Sunice
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Marine Accessories Corporation
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Sunice
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Sporting Goods Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Marine Accessories Corporation in 2025.

Incidents vs Sporting Goods Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sunice in 2025.

Incident History — Marine Accessories Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Marine Accessories Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Sunice (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sunice cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/marine-accessories-corp.jpeg
Marine Accessories Corporation
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sunice.jpeg
Sunice
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Sunice company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Marine Accessories Corporation company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Sunice company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Marine Accessories Corporation company.

In the current year, Sunice company and Marine Accessories Corporation company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Sunice company nor Marine Accessories Corporation company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Sunice company nor Marine Accessories Corporation company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Sunice company nor Marine Accessories Corporation company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Marine Accessories Corporation company nor Sunice company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Marine Accessories Corporation nor Sunice holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Marine Accessories Corporation company nor Sunice company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Sunice company employs more people globally than Marine Accessories Corporation company, reflecting its scale as a Sporting Goods.

Neither Marine Accessories Corporation nor Sunice holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Marine Accessories Corporation nor Sunice holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Marine Accessories Corporation nor Sunice holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Marine Accessories Corporation nor Sunice holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Marine Accessories Corporation nor Sunice holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Marine Accessories Corporation nor Sunice holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H