Comparison Overview

Allison B. Margolin, PLC

VS

Shea Law Group

Allison B. Margolin, PLC

8484 Wilshire Blvd., Beverly Hills, California, 90211, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Allison B. Margolin, A Professional Law Corporation is California's leading cannabis law firm. Founded by attorney Allison Margolin, we have over a decade of experience serving the cannabis industry. Our full-service practice includes compliance & licensing, outside general counsel advisory, due diligence, M&A, and business litigation and arbitration. We have a statewide practice in California with offices in Beverly Hills and San Francisco.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Shea Law Group

2400 North Western Avenue, Chicago, IL, 60647, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

SHEA LAW GROUP: ATTORNEYS FIGHTING FOR CHICAGO INJURY VICTIMS Joseph Patrick Shea started SHEA LAW GROUP in 1997 after gaining experience in other Chicago litigation law firms, and in the process, trying over 75 trials and obtaining million dollar settlements and verdicts. The firm now has grown from a solo practice and currently includes four attorneys and eight paralegal and support staff members dedicated to fighting for the rights of victims of accidents throughout Chicago, Illinois. If you or a loved one has been injured in an accident caused by another party's negligence, you need an attorney to protect your rights. The Chicago personal injury attorneys at SHEA LAW GROUP have over 60 years of combined experience representing Chicago personal injury victims. We are dedicated to improving the quality of life of our clients and treat our clients with compassion and understanding, while aggressively fighting for their rights.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/margolin-&-lawrence-llp.jpeg
Allison B. Margolin, PLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/shea-law-group.jpeg
Shea Law Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Allison B. Margolin, PLC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Shea Law Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Allison B. Margolin, PLC in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Shea Law Group in 2025.

Incident History — Allison B. Margolin, PLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Allison B. Margolin, PLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Shea Law Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Shea Law Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/margolin-&-lawrence-llp.jpeg
Allison B. Margolin, PLC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/shea-law-group.jpeg
Shea Law Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Shea Law Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Allison B. Margolin, PLC company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Shea Law Group company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Allison B. Margolin, PLC company.

In the current year, Shea Law Group company and Allison B. Margolin, PLC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Shea Law Group company nor Allison B. Margolin, PLC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Shea Law Group company nor Allison B. Margolin, PLC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Shea Law Group company nor Allison B. Margolin, PLC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Allison B. Margolin, PLC company nor Shea Law Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Allison B. Margolin, PLC nor Shea Law Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Allison B. Margolin, PLC company nor Shea Law Group company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Shea Law Group company employs more people globally than Allison B. Margolin, PLC company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Allison B. Margolin, PLC nor Shea Law Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Allison B. Margolin, PLC nor Shea Law Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Allison B. Margolin, PLC nor Shea Law Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Allison B. Margolin, PLC nor Shea Law Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Allison B. Margolin, PLC nor Shea Law Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Allison B. Margolin, PLC nor Shea Law Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X