Comparison Overview

Margaritaville Restaurant & Casino Biloxi

VS

Silverado Casino

Margaritaville Restaurant & Casino Biloxi

None
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Change your latitude and experience the Gulf Coast's most unique gaming destination! At Margaritaville Biloxi, every day is a party with the hottest games and giveaways, plus FINtastic deals on delicious dining! Discover your License to Chill at the One Particular Harbour... Margaritaville Biloxi... It's not just a casino... It's a state of mind!

NAICS: 713
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 46
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Silverado Casino

1380 W. NEWLANDS DRIVE, FERNLEY, NEVADA, 89408, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Silverado Casino has been family owned and operated since 1994. We take pride in providing a high-quality food and entertainment option to the Fernley community for over 25 years. Silverado Casino offers the total experience, whether you are looking for a nice meal or entertainment, Silverado Casino is the place to go. We strive not only to meet customers’ expectations but exceed them.

NAICS: 713
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 29
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/margaritaville-restaurant-&-casino-biloxi.jpeg
Margaritaville Restaurant & Casino Biloxi
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/silverado-casino.jpeg
Silverado Casino
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Margaritaville Restaurant & Casino Biloxi
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Silverado Casino
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Margaritaville Restaurant & Casino Biloxi in 2025.

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Silverado Casino in 2025.

Incident History — Margaritaville Restaurant & Casino Biloxi (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Margaritaville Restaurant & Casino Biloxi cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Silverado Casino (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Silverado Casino cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/margaritaville-restaurant-&-casino-biloxi.jpeg
Margaritaville Restaurant & Casino Biloxi
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/silverado-casino.jpeg
Silverado Casino
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Silverado Casino company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Margaritaville Restaurant & Casino Biloxi company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Silverado Casino company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Margaritaville Restaurant & Casino Biloxi company.

In the current year, Silverado Casino company and Margaritaville Restaurant & Casino Biloxi company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Silverado Casino company nor Margaritaville Restaurant & Casino Biloxi company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Silverado Casino company nor Margaritaville Restaurant & Casino Biloxi company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Silverado Casino company nor Margaritaville Restaurant & Casino Biloxi company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Margaritaville Restaurant & Casino Biloxi company nor Silverado Casino company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Margaritaville Restaurant & Casino Biloxi nor Silverado Casino holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Margaritaville Restaurant & Casino Biloxi company nor Silverado Casino company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Margaritaville Restaurant & Casino Biloxi company employs more people globally than Silverado Casino company, reflecting its scale as a Gambling Facilities and Casinos.

Neither Margaritaville Restaurant & Casino Biloxi nor Silverado Casino holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Margaritaville Restaurant & Casino Biloxi nor Silverado Casino holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Margaritaville Restaurant & Casino Biloxi nor Silverado Casino holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Margaritaville Restaurant & Casino Biloxi nor Silverado Casino holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Margaritaville Restaurant & Casino Biloxi nor Silverado Casino holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Margaritaville Restaurant & Casino Biloxi nor Silverado Casino holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H