Comparison Overview

Mardi Gras Gaming

VS

Spirit Mountain Casino

Mardi Gras Gaming

undefined, undefined, undefined, 33009, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Mardi Gras Casino at Hollywood Racetrack is over 70,000 square feet of pure casino excitement. With over 1,400 Vegas styles slots, 30 action-packed poker tables and Mardi Gras style and panache, it is the hottest casino on the east side of town just minutes from beautiful beaches. It’s Always Fat Tuesday at Mardi Gras Gaming where the party never ends.

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 112
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Spirit Mountain Casino

27100 Salmon River Hwy, Grand Ronde, Oregon, 97347, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Spirit Mountain Casino lies on the Grand Ronde Tribal reservation amid the beautiful Oregon Coast. Surrounded by the breathtaking Coastal Range and the Pacific Ocean, Grand Ronde is rich in culture and recreational possibilities. Hiking, camping, nearby Lincoln City, and the many historical facilities make any trip to the area an experience to remember. Western Oregon has been home to the ancestors of the Confederated Tribes of Grand Ronde for many hundreds of years. Our unique way of life and appreciation for the bountiful land has been passed down through the generations. This sense of natural respect and cultural heritage inspired the architecture, design, and layout of Spirit Mountain Casino and Hotel. We cordially invite you to discover Grand Ronde. We’re sure you’ll love its tradition, culture, and beauty. - 1,800 Slot Machines - 27 Table Games - Luxurious Hotel

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 451
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mardi-gras-gaming.jpeg
Mardi Gras Gaming
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/spirit-mountain-casino.jpeg
Spirit Mountain Casino
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Mardi Gras Gaming
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Spirit Mountain Casino
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mardi Gras Gaming in 2025.

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Spirit Mountain Casino in 2025.

Incident History — Mardi Gras Gaming (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mardi Gras Gaming cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Spirit Mountain Casino (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Spirit Mountain Casino cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mardi-gras-gaming.jpeg
Mardi Gras Gaming
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/spirit-mountain-casino.jpeg
Spirit Mountain Casino
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Spirit Mountain Casino company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Mardi Gras Gaming company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Spirit Mountain Casino company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Mardi Gras Gaming company.

In the current year, Spirit Mountain Casino company and Mardi Gras Gaming company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Spirit Mountain Casino company nor Mardi Gras Gaming company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Spirit Mountain Casino company nor Mardi Gras Gaming company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Spirit Mountain Casino company nor Mardi Gras Gaming company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Mardi Gras Gaming company nor Spirit Mountain Casino company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Mardi Gras Gaming nor Spirit Mountain Casino holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Mardi Gras Gaming company nor Spirit Mountain Casino company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Spirit Mountain Casino company employs more people globally than Mardi Gras Gaming company, reflecting its scale as a Gambling Facilities and Casinos.

Neither Mardi Gras Gaming nor Spirit Mountain Casino holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Mardi Gras Gaming nor Spirit Mountain Casino holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Mardi Gras Gaming nor Spirit Mountain Casino holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Mardi Gras Gaming nor Spirit Mountain Casino holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Mardi Gras Gaming nor Spirit Mountain Casino holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Mardi Gras Gaming nor Spirit Mountain Casino holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H