Comparison Overview

Marcus Performing Arts Center

VS

Blyth Festival

Marcus Performing Arts Center

929 N. Water St., Milwaukee, WI, 53202, US
Last Update: 2025-12-09
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.marcuscenter.org

A mission-based non-profit organization located in downtown Milwaukee, the Marcus Performing Arts Center (MPAC) brings high-quality arts and cultural programming to Southeastern Wisconsin. MPAC strives to act as an energizing force that connects the community to the world through collaboration, innovation, social engagement, and the transformative power of the performing arts. Through multiple performance series, community events, and educational experiences, MPAC brings a diverse range of celebrated artists to the region. A fixture in Milwaukee for over 50 years, MPAC is proud to be part of the Milwaukee Theater District as well as a dedicated War Memorial facility.

NAICS: 7111
NAICS Definition: Performing Arts Companies
Employees: 98
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Blyth Festival

P.O. Box 10, Blyth, Ontario N0M 1H0, CA
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799
http://www.blythfestival.com

The Blyth Festival is a professional repertory theatre that endeavours to enrich the lives of its audience by producing and developing plays that give voice to both the region and the country. Our Mandate: - to provide interest in and the study of the arts generally, and literature, drama, and music in particular; - to advance knowledge of, and appreciation of, and to stimulate interest in the dramatic culture and tradition by theatrical performances and otherwise; - to provide facilities for education and instruction in the arts of theatre; - to provide improved opportunities for Canadian artistic talent; - to advance the development of the arts of theatre in Canada; - to conduct an annual festival of such in the Village of Blyth; - to collect monies by way of donations and otherwise.

NAICS: 7111
NAICS Definition: Performing Arts Companies
Employees: 19
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/marcus-center-for-the-performing-arts.jpeg
Marcus Performing Arts Center
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/blyth-festival.jpeg
Blyth Festival
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Marcus Performing Arts Center
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Blyth Festival
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Marcus Performing Arts Center in 2025.

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Blyth Festival in 2025.

Incident History — Marcus Performing Arts Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Marcus Performing Arts Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Blyth Festival (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Blyth Festival cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/marcus-center-for-the-performing-arts.jpeg
Marcus Performing Arts Center
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/blyth-festival.jpeg
Blyth Festival
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Blyth Festival company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Marcus Performing Arts Center company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Blyth Festival company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Marcus Performing Arts Center company.

In the current year, Blyth Festival company and Marcus Performing Arts Center company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Blyth Festival company nor Marcus Performing Arts Center company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Blyth Festival company nor Marcus Performing Arts Center company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Blyth Festival company nor Marcus Performing Arts Center company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Marcus Performing Arts Center company nor Blyth Festival company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Marcus Performing Arts Center nor Blyth Festival holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Marcus Performing Arts Center company nor Blyth Festival company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Marcus Performing Arts Center company employs more people globally than Blyth Festival company, reflecting its scale as a Performing Arts.

Neither Marcus Performing Arts Center nor Blyth Festival holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Marcus Performing Arts Center nor Blyth Festival holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Marcus Performing Arts Center nor Blyth Festival holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Marcus Performing Arts Center nor Blyth Festival holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Marcus Performing Arts Center nor Blyth Festival holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Marcus Performing Arts Center nor Blyth Festival holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References