Comparison Overview

Marcus A. Roberts & Associates LLC

VS

Roll Law Group

Marcus A. Roberts & Associates LLC

1401 Peachtree St. NE , Atlanta, GA, 30309, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Marcus A. Roberts & Associates represents clients injured as the result of another party's negligence. Marcus A. Roberts graduated with honors from Morehouse College in Atlanta before earning his Juris Doctorate at The University of Texas at Austin. In 2009, he established the Law Firm of Marcus A. Roberts & Associates LLC and began specializing in the area of criminal defense, although the firm expanded into a predominantly personal injury practice. Marcus A. Roberts represents people who suffered serious injuries as the result of automobile accidents, medical malpractice, and many other types of negligence.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Roll Law Group

11444 W Olympic Blvd, Los Angeles, 90064, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Roll Law Group is the captive litigation law firm for The Wonderful Company, a privately held $5 billion company with over 8,500 employees and including such well-known brands as Wonderful Pistachios, Wonderful Almonds, Wonderful Halos, Wonderful Sweet Scarletts, POM Wonderful, FIJI Water, JUSTIN and Landmark wines, and Teleflora. Roll Law Group has more than 20 litigation attorneys plus staff, providing litigation services to all of The Wonderful Company’s operating businesses. Its attorneys try cases and appear in federal and state courts nationwide as well as various government and administrative agencies, with significant expertise in, among other legal disciplines, employment, regulatory affairs, consumer protection, class actions, intellectual property, and trademark and brand enforcement.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 39
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/marcus-a-roberts-associates-llc.jpeg
Marcus A. Roberts & Associates LLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/roll-law-group.jpeg
Roll Law Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Marcus A. Roberts & Associates LLC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Roll Law Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Marcus A. Roberts & Associates LLC in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Roll Law Group in 2025.

Incident History — Marcus A. Roberts & Associates LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Marcus A. Roberts & Associates LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Roll Law Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Roll Law Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/marcus-a-roberts-associates-llc.jpeg
Marcus A. Roberts & Associates LLC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/roll-law-group.jpeg
Roll Law Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Marcus A. Roberts & Associates LLC company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Roll Law Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Roll Law Group company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Marcus A. Roberts & Associates LLC company.

In the current year, Roll Law Group company and Marcus A. Roberts & Associates LLC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Roll Law Group company nor Marcus A. Roberts & Associates LLC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Roll Law Group company nor Marcus A. Roberts & Associates LLC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Roll Law Group company nor Marcus A. Roberts & Associates LLC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Marcus A. Roberts & Associates LLC company nor Roll Law Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Marcus A. Roberts & Associates LLC nor Roll Law Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Marcus A. Roberts & Associates LLC company nor Roll Law Group company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Roll Law Group company employs more people globally than Marcus A. Roberts & Associates LLC company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Marcus A. Roberts & Associates LLC nor Roll Law Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Marcus A. Roberts & Associates LLC nor Roll Law Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Marcus A. Roberts & Associates LLC nor Roll Law Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Marcus A. Roberts & Associates LLC nor Roll Law Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Marcus A. Roberts & Associates LLC nor Roll Law Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Marcus A. Roberts & Associates LLC nor Roll Law Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X