Comparison Overview

Marcoux Allen

VS

Woollcombe Yonge Solicitors LLP

Marcoux Allen

145 South Jackson Street, Jackson, 49201, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Marcoux Allen was established in 1847 and is one of Michigan's oldest law firms. Marcoux Allen has continued to serve clients for such a long period of time by clearly defining and achieving our client's needs and goals. Marcoux Allen represents local, national and international business clients, and also serves the needs of individual clients in the areas of estate planning, tax counseling, and personal matters.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 10
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Woollcombe Yonge Solicitors LLP

63-65 Bretonside, Plymouth, Devon, PL4 0BD, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Everything and everyone at Woollcombe Yonge will exceed your expectations. The firm has been serving the needs of small to medium-sized businesses, families and individuals for over 250 years, combining traditional values of commitment and reliability with a modern and progressive approach to the delivery of legal services. Our exceptional staff are friendly, approachable and use plain English. Our approach is “can do” and client focused. By understanding your needs, we deliver the best possible service. Our legal services include Business Transfer, Property sales and Purchases, Wills Probate and Tax Planning, Divorce, Finance and Children and Police Station and Court Representation. If you need a modern, committed and efficient law firm, contact us or drop in to our easily accessible offices in Plymouth’s city centre.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 38
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Marcoux Allen
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/woollcombe-yonge-solicitors-llp.jpeg
Woollcombe Yonge Solicitors LLP
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Marcoux Allen
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Woollcombe Yonge Solicitors LLP
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Marcoux Allen in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Woollcombe Yonge Solicitors LLP in 2025.

Incident History — Marcoux Allen (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Marcoux Allen cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Woollcombe Yonge Solicitors LLP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Woollcombe Yonge Solicitors LLP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Marcoux Allen
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/woollcombe-yonge-solicitors-llp.jpeg
Woollcombe Yonge Solicitors LLP
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Marcoux Allen company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Woollcombe Yonge Solicitors LLP company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Woollcombe Yonge Solicitors LLP company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Marcoux Allen company.

In the current year, Woollcombe Yonge Solicitors LLP company and Marcoux Allen company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Woollcombe Yonge Solicitors LLP company nor Marcoux Allen company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Woollcombe Yonge Solicitors LLP company nor Marcoux Allen company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Woollcombe Yonge Solicitors LLP company nor Marcoux Allen company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Marcoux Allen company nor Woollcombe Yonge Solicitors LLP company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Marcoux Allen nor Woollcombe Yonge Solicitors LLP holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Marcoux Allen company nor Woollcombe Yonge Solicitors LLP company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Woollcombe Yonge Solicitors LLP company employs more people globally than Marcoux Allen company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Marcoux Allen nor Woollcombe Yonge Solicitors LLP holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Marcoux Allen nor Woollcombe Yonge Solicitors LLP holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Marcoux Allen nor Woollcombe Yonge Solicitors LLP holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Marcoux Allen nor Woollcombe Yonge Solicitors LLP holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Marcoux Allen nor Woollcombe Yonge Solicitors LLP holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Marcoux Allen nor Woollcombe Yonge Solicitors LLP holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X