Comparison Overview

Marcoux Allen

VS

Pett Franklin

Marcoux Allen

145 South Jackson Street, Jackson, 49201, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Marcoux Allen was established in 1847 and is one of Michigan's oldest law firms. Marcoux Allen has continued to serve clients for such a long period of time by clearly defining and achieving our client's needs and goals. Marcoux Allen represents local, national and international business clients, and also serves the needs of individual clients in the areas of estate planning, tax counseling, and personal matters.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 10
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Pett Franklin

116 Colmore Row, Birmingham, undefined, B3 3BD, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Our aims are to add value to companies by "helping share growth"​, and in the process become the leading firm of UK advisers on all aspects of executive and employee incentives, share plans and corporate governance. William Franklin (Partner, Non-Solicitor) is a Chartered Accountant who is widely recognised as a leading advisor on the accounting and financial aspects of all forms of remuneration, incentive and employee share schemes. He previously worked for Pinsent Mason and Ernst & Young. Stephen Woodhouse (Partner) is a former Partner at Deloitte who started his career at Slaughter and May before moving to Norton Rose and from there to Deloitte. Specialising in the tax aspects of remuneration and in particular employee share schemes, pension structuring and employee trusts, Stephen has worked across a wide range of industries and organisations, both domestically in the UK and internationally. His clients have extended from some of the largest multinationals to small, owner managed businesses covering a wide range of size and organisations types in between. At Pett Franklin, he is working with William Franklin to provide a service based on high quality, specialist advice. Pett, Franklin & Co. LLP are experts in employee share schemes, share valuations and executive incentives. To find out how we can help you or your client, please call us on 0121 348 7878 or email [email protected].

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Marcoux Allen
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pett-franklin-&-co-llp.jpeg
Pett Franklin
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Marcoux Allen
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Pett Franklin
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Marcoux Allen in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pett Franklin in 2025.

Incident History — Marcoux Allen (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Marcoux Allen cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Pett Franklin (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pett Franklin cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Marcoux Allen
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pett-franklin-&-co-llp.jpeg
Pett Franklin
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Marcoux Allen company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Pett Franklin company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Pett Franklin company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Marcoux Allen company.

In the current year, Pett Franklin company and Marcoux Allen company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Pett Franklin company nor Marcoux Allen company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Pett Franklin company nor Marcoux Allen company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Pett Franklin company nor Marcoux Allen company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Marcoux Allen company nor Pett Franklin company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Marcoux Allen nor Pett Franklin holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Marcoux Allen company nor Pett Franklin company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Marcoux Allen company employs more people globally than Pett Franklin company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Marcoux Allen nor Pett Franklin holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Marcoux Allen nor Pett Franklin holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Marcoux Allen nor Pett Franklin holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Marcoux Allen nor Pett Franklin holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Marcoux Allen nor Pett Franklin holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Marcoux Allen nor Pett Franklin holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X