Comparison Overview

Minnesota Alliance of Recovery Community Organizations

VS

Linara GmbH

Minnesota Alliance of Recovery Community Organizations

Saint Paul, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Founded by leaders of Minnesota’s grassroots Recovery Community Organizations (RCOs), MARCO is a statewide nonprofit organization working to build an ecosystem of recovery. We believe that long-term system change starts in our communities and that RCOs are essential partners in building a recovery-oriented society. Our mission is to educate, advocate, and mobilize resources to grow the community-based recovery movement across Minnesota.

NAICS: 923
NAICS Definition: Administration of Human Resource Programs
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Linara GmbH

Kitzingstraße 15-19, Berlin, Berlin, DE, 12277
Last Update: 2025-11-23
Between 750 and 799

The Linara Group is an established provider of home senior care in Germany. Our goal at Linara - Home Care is to provide professional and compassionate 24-hour care for seniors in need. Linara FairCare creates attractive employment opportunities for independent caregivers from Eastern Europe and ensures they are treated and supported fairly. Linara - Home Care: 24-hour care for maximum safety and optimal support Specialized care for seniors and individuals with dementia Assistance with household tasks, such as cooking, cleaning, and laundry Promotion of emotional well-being through social interaction and companionship Qualified and dedicated caregivers Linara FairCare: Attractive employment opportunities for caregivers from Eastern Europe Fair and legal working conditions Support with organizational matters before, during, and after employment Safety and well-being of employees are prioritized Fair wages and comprehensive support Discover how the Linara Group can help you or your loved ones, and learn more about our comprehensive care services and commitment to fair working conditions.

NAICS: 923
NAICS Definition: Administration of Human Resource Programs
Employees: 40
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/marco-mn.jpeg
Minnesota Alliance of Recovery Community Organizations
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/linara.jpeg
Linara GmbH
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Minnesota Alliance of Recovery Community Organizations
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Linara GmbH
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Health and Human Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Minnesota Alliance of Recovery Community Organizations in 2025.

Incidents vs Health and Human Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Linara GmbH in 2025.

Incident History — Minnesota Alliance of Recovery Community Organizations (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Minnesota Alliance of Recovery Community Organizations cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Linara GmbH (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Linara GmbH cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/marco-mn.jpeg
Minnesota Alliance of Recovery Community Organizations
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/linara.jpeg
Linara GmbH
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Linara GmbH company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Minnesota Alliance of Recovery Community Organizations company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Linara GmbH company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Minnesota Alliance of Recovery Community Organizations company.

In the current year, Linara GmbH company and Minnesota Alliance of Recovery Community Organizations company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Linara GmbH company nor Minnesota Alliance of Recovery Community Organizations company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Linara GmbH company nor Minnesota Alliance of Recovery Community Organizations company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Linara GmbH company nor Minnesota Alliance of Recovery Community Organizations company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Minnesota Alliance of Recovery Community Organizations company nor Linara GmbH company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Minnesota Alliance of Recovery Community Organizations nor Linara GmbH holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Minnesota Alliance of Recovery Community Organizations company nor Linara GmbH company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Linara GmbH company employs more people globally than Minnesota Alliance of Recovery Community Organizations company, reflecting its scale as a Health and Human Services.

Neither Minnesota Alliance of Recovery Community Organizations nor Linara GmbH holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Minnesota Alliance of Recovery Community Organizations nor Linara GmbH holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Minnesota Alliance of Recovery Community Organizations nor Linara GmbH holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Minnesota Alliance of Recovery Community Organizations nor Linara GmbH holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Minnesota Alliance of Recovery Community Organizations nor Linara GmbH holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Minnesota Alliance of Recovery Community Organizations nor Linara GmbH holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H