Comparison Overview

Marathon Printing, Inc.

VS

Bag Tags, Inc.

Marathon Printing, Inc.

390 NE 9th St, Gresham, Oregon, 97030, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.marathononline.com

We ship custom designed race bibs, stock bibs and race accessories all over the globe for any kind of event. We have provided numbers for running events like Lilac Bloomsday Run, Hot Chocolate Race, Portland Marathon and Gasparilla Distance. We also print for television programs like Portlandia, Frasier and Two and a Half Men, music videos, television commercials, and movies like Jerry Maguire. Est. 1989

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 19
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Bag Tags, Inc.

1316 Sherman Ave, Evanston, 60201, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
http://www.bagtagsinc.com

Bag Tags, Inc. is an event communications company. There is no substitute for clear and effective communication, and our products do exactly that. Our Credentials and Lanyards will amplify security, improve organization and add grandeur. And our Luggage Tags will build brand awareness and make for the perfect keepsake for your attendees. We also provide beautiful and durable custom wristbands, nameplates, parking passes and business cards!

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 10
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/marathon-printing.jpeg
Marathon Printing, Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bag-tags-inc.jpeg
Bag Tags, Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Marathon Printing, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Bag Tags, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Marathon Printing, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bag Tags, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — Marathon Printing, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Marathon Printing, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Bag Tags, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bag Tags, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/marathon-printing.jpeg
Marathon Printing, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bag-tags-inc.jpeg
Bag Tags, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Marathon Printing, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Bag Tags, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Bag Tags, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Marathon Printing, Inc. company.

In the current year, Bag Tags, Inc. company and Marathon Printing, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Bag Tags, Inc. company nor Marathon Printing, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Bag Tags, Inc. company nor Marathon Printing, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Bag Tags, Inc. company nor Marathon Printing, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Marathon Printing, Inc. company nor Bag Tags, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Marathon Printing, Inc. nor Bag Tags, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Marathon Printing, Inc. company nor Bag Tags, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Marathon Printing, Inc. company employs more people globally than Bag Tags, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Marathon Printing, Inc. nor Bag Tags, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Marathon Printing, Inc. nor Bag Tags, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Marathon Printing, Inc. nor Bag Tags, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Marathon Printing, Inc. nor Bag Tags, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Marathon Printing, Inc. nor Bag Tags, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Marathon Printing, Inc. nor Bag Tags, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References