Comparison Overview

Massachusetts Public Health Alliance

VS

Arkansas Public Policy Panel

Massachusetts Public Health Alliance

50 Federal St, 8th floor, Boston, Massachusetts, US, 02110
Last Update: 2025-11-27
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.mapublichealth.org

The Massachusetts Public Health Alliance (MPHA) is a nonprofit organization that promotes a healthy Massachusetts through advocacy, community organizing, and coalition building. We are leaders in the movement to create health equity by addressing the root causes of health and wellness. We promote policies that impact the major drivers of health outcomes, such as access to healthy food, safe affordable housing, and transportation. We also advocate for equitable public health services throughout the Commonwealth. Mission MPHA is a catalyst for community-driven policy change that fosters conditions for people to achieve their full health potential where they live, work, and play. We advocate and organize in partnership to dismantle structural racism and address the other root causes of health inequities. Vision A Massachusetts of healthy, equitable, just, and thriving communities where racism, poverty, and zip code do not determine our health or lifespan.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Arkansas Public Policy Panel

1308 W 2nd St, Little Rock, Arkansas, 72201, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749
http://www.arpanel.org

Founded in 1963, the Arkansas Public Policy Panel organizes communities to create infrastructure, set goals and develop action plans for better schools, safer neighborhoods, accountable government, and more. We are invited into communities where we help residents develop the tools to realize their vision of social justice, economic prosperity, accountable government, and improved quality of life.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 17
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mapublichealth.jpeg
Massachusetts Public Health Alliance
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/arkansas-public-policy-panel.jpeg
Arkansas Public Policy Panel
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Massachusetts Public Health Alliance
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Arkansas Public Policy Panel
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Massachusetts Public Health Alliance in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Arkansas Public Policy Panel in 2025.

Incident History — Massachusetts Public Health Alliance (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Massachusetts Public Health Alliance cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Arkansas Public Policy Panel (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Arkansas Public Policy Panel cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mapublichealth.jpeg
Massachusetts Public Health Alliance
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/arkansas-public-policy-panel.jpeg
Arkansas Public Policy Panel
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Arkansas Public Policy Panel company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Massachusetts Public Health Alliance company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Arkansas Public Policy Panel company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Massachusetts Public Health Alliance company.

In the current year, Arkansas Public Policy Panel company and Massachusetts Public Health Alliance company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Arkansas Public Policy Panel company nor Massachusetts Public Health Alliance company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Arkansas Public Policy Panel company nor Massachusetts Public Health Alliance company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Arkansas Public Policy Panel company nor Massachusetts Public Health Alliance company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Massachusetts Public Health Alliance company nor Arkansas Public Policy Panel company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Massachusetts Public Health Alliance nor Arkansas Public Policy Panel holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Massachusetts Public Health Alliance company nor Arkansas Public Policy Panel company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Arkansas Public Policy Panel company employs more people globally than Massachusetts Public Health Alliance company, reflecting its scale as a Public Policy Offices.

Neither Massachusetts Public Health Alliance nor Arkansas Public Policy Panel holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Massachusetts Public Health Alliance nor Arkansas Public Policy Panel holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Massachusetts Public Health Alliance nor Arkansas Public Policy Panel holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Massachusetts Public Health Alliance nor Arkansas Public Policy Panel holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Massachusetts Public Health Alliance nor Arkansas Public Policy Panel holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Massachusetts Public Health Alliance nor Arkansas Public Policy Panel holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References