Comparison Overview

maps | Mediation & Arbitration

VS

OpenLegal

maps | Mediation & Arbitration

Heritage Plaza, 111 Veterans Blvd., Suite 800, Metairie, LA, US, 70005
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Mediation is no longer Alternative Dispute Resolution. It's PREFERRED Dispute Resolution - by far, the most preferred way for litigants to resolve disputes. In 1987, we became Louisiana’s original alternative dispute leader. Our prestigious Mediation Panel, including attorneys, retired judges and justices, has handled over 55,000 cases, ranging from simple tort to complex class actions and commercial matters. Our services are available nationwide, and include Arbitration, Mediation, Umpires/Appraisals, and CLE and CE seminars.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 28
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

OpenLegal

undefined, Sydney, New South Wales, 2000, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 700 and 749

OpenLegal is a commercial law firm, providing flexible solutions for the legal needs of our clients at the scale needed. We have reimagined the way legal services can be delivered, with our clients’ experience top of mind. - Build your inhouse legal capacity by having one of our lawyers join your team through our secondment service. - Outsource the legal needs of your business with one of our subscription packages. - Engage us as a law firm for all commercial legals.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mapsmediation.jpeg
maps | Mediation & Arbitration
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/openlegalaus.jpeg
OpenLegal
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
maps | Mediation & Arbitration
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
OpenLegal
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for maps | Mediation & Arbitration in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for OpenLegal in 2025.

Incident History — maps | Mediation & Arbitration (X = Date, Y = Severity)

maps | Mediation & Arbitration cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — OpenLegal (X = Date, Y = Severity)

OpenLegal cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mapsmediation.jpeg
maps | Mediation & Arbitration
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/openlegalaus.jpeg
OpenLegal
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

maps | Mediation & Arbitration company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to OpenLegal company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, OpenLegal company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to maps | Mediation & Arbitration company.

In the current year, OpenLegal company and maps | Mediation & Arbitration company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither OpenLegal company nor maps | Mediation & Arbitration company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither OpenLegal company nor maps | Mediation & Arbitration company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither OpenLegal company nor maps | Mediation & Arbitration company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither maps | Mediation & Arbitration company nor OpenLegal company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither maps | Mediation & Arbitration nor OpenLegal holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither maps | Mediation & Arbitration company nor OpenLegal company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

maps | Mediation & Arbitration company employs more people globally than OpenLegal company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither maps | Mediation & Arbitration nor OpenLegal holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither maps | Mediation & Arbitration nor OpenLegal holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither maps | Mediation & Arbitration nor OpenLegal holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither maps | Mediation & Arbitration nor OpenLegal holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither maps | Mediation & Arbitration nor OpenLegal holds HIPAA certification.

Neither maps | Mediation & Arbitration nor OpenLegal holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X