Comparison Overview

MAPFRE

VS

Gallagher

MAPFRE

Carretera de Pozuelo, 52, Majadahonda, 28220, ES
Last Update: 2025-12-09
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.mapfre.com

At MAPFRE, we’re committed to protecting what matters most to you. That’s why we’re the largest Spanish-owned insurer in the world, the largest multinational insurance company in Latin America and among the 15 largest European groups by premium volume. With a legacy spanning more than 90 years, we’re proud to provide innovative insurance and service solutions to protect people and companies around the world. Our purpose is to be by your side, accompanying you to move forward with peace of mind, contributing to the development of a more sustainable and caring society, while our global footprint enables us to guarantee solvency, promote innovation, and provide the best service, all the while acting with the utmost integrity. At MAPFRE, we believe in the power of people. Our multicultural and diverse team is the driving force behind our success, bringing our vision and mission to life, contributing their talent, passion and experience day after day. If you want to learn more about MAPFRE, please visit our website or the Life in the Company section here. Welcome to MAPFRE!

NAICS: 524
NAICS Definition: Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees: 36,726
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Gallagher

2850 Golf Road, None, Rolling Meadows, IL, US, 60008
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799
https://linktr.ee/GallagherGlobal

Gallagher, a global insurance brokerage, risk management, and consulting firm, serves communities around the globe, helping clients address risk, protecting assets, and recovering from losses. The products and services we provide keep businesses and institutions running, and enable individuals and families to face their future with confidence. Gallagher provides retail and wholesale property and casualty brokerage, alternative risk transfer services, employee benefit consulting, and actuarial services. Gallagher also offers claims and information management, risk control consulting and appraisal services, human resource consulting, and retirement services. Follow us on social: Instagram: http://instagram.com/gallagherglobal Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/GallagherGlobal Twitter: https://twitter.com/GallagherGlobal YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/GallagherGlobal

NAICS: 524
NAICS Definition: Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees: 43,519
Subsidiaries: 22
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
5
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mapfre.jpeg
MAPFRE
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gallagher-global.jpeg
Gallagher
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
MAPFRE
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Gallagher
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MAPFRE in 2025.

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Gallagher in 2025.

Incident History — MAPFRE (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MAPFRE cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Gallagher (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gallagher cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mapfre.jpeg
MAPFRE
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gallagher-global.jpeg
Gallagher
Incidents

Date Detected: 07/2022
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Ransomware
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 7/2020
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2020
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Hacking
Blog: Blog

FAQ

MAPFRE company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Gallagher company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Gallagher company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas MAPFRE company has not reported any.

In the current year, Gallagher company and MAPFRE company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Gallagher company nor MAPFRE company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Gallagher company has disclosed at least one data breach, while MAPFRE company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Gallagher company nor MAPFRE company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither MAPFRE company nor Gallagher company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither MAPFRE nor Gallagher holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Gallagher company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to MAPFRE company.

Gallagher company employs more people globally than MAPFRE company, reflecting its scale as a Insurance.

Neither MAPFRE nor Gallagher holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither MAPFRE nor Gallagher holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither MAPFRE nor Gallagher holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither MAPFRE nor Gallagher holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither MAPFRE nor Gallagher holds HIPAA certification.

Neither MAPFRE nor Gallagher holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References