Comparison Overview

MAP Fund

VS

Wharton Center for Performing Arts

MAP Fund

15 Maiden Lane, Floor 18, New York, New York, 10038, US
Last Update: 2025-12-14
Between 750 and 799

The MAP Fund invests in artistic production as the critical foundation of imagining — and ultimately co-creating — a more equitable and vibrant society. MAP awards $1 million annually to up to 40 projects in the range of $10,000 – $45,000 per grant. MAP supports original live performance projects that embody a spirit of deep inquiry, particularly works created by artists who question, disrupt, complicate, and challenge inherited notions of social and cultural hierarchy across the United States. Funded projects address these concerns through the processes of creating and distributing live performance to the public, and/or through the content and themes of the work itself. MAP is committed to intersectional anti-racism, and does not support cultural appropriation or oppressive project language, structures, or content.

NAICS: 711
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Wharton Center for Performing Arts

750 E Shaw Lane, East Lansing, Michigan, 48824, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799

Wharton Center is Michigan’s largest performing arts venue with four unique stages (the Cobb Great Hall, Pasant Theatre, MSU Concert Auditorium and Fairchild Theatre) and plenty of things to do and see all season. Wharton Center is proud to bring the best Broadway shows, the finest classical musicians, unrivaled dance companies and an A-list of high profile performers to mid-Michigan. We are the leading presenting venue among Big 10 institutions and have the largest programming schedule of any independent performing arts center affiliated with a university in the country. Wharton Center is also recognized internationally for our world premier commissions. The Center is fortunate to hire artists to create new works in jazz, dance, and classical music that make a world debut at Wharton Center.

NAICS: 7111
NAICS Definition: Performing Arts Companies
Employees: 176
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/map-fund.jpeg
MAP Fund
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wharton-center-for-performing-arts.jpeg
Wharton Center for Performing Arts
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
MAP Fund
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Wharton Center for Performing Arts
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MAP Fund in 2025.

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Wharton Center for Performing Arts in 2025.

Incident History — MAP Fund (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MAP Fund cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Wharton Center for Performing Arts (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Wharton Center for Performing Arts cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/map-fund.jpeg
MAP Fund
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wharton-center-for-performing-arts.jpeg
Wharton Center for Performing Arts
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Wharton Center for Performing Arts company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to MAP Fund company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Wharton Center for Performing Arts company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to MAP Fund company.

In the current year, Wharton Center for Performing Arts company and MAP Fund company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Wharton Center for Performing Arts company nor MAP Fund company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Wharton Center for Performing Arts company nor MAP Fund company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Wharton Center for Performing Arts company nor MAP Fund company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither MAP Fund company nor Wharton Center for Performing Arts company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither MAP Fund nor Wharton Center for Performing Arts holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither MAP Fund company nor Wharton Center for Performing Arts company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Wharton Center for Performing Arts company employs more people globally than MAP Fund company, reflecting its scale as a Performing Arts.

Neither MAP Fund nor Wharton Center for Performing Arts holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither MAP Fund nor Wharton Center for Performing Arts holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither MAP Fund nor Wharton Center for Performing Arts holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither MAP Fund nor Wharton Center for Performing Arts holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither MAP Fund nor Wharton Center for Performing Arts holds HIPAA certification.

Neither MAP Fund nor Wharton Center for Performing Arts holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N