Comparison Overview

Header Bidding

VS

Argus Observer

Header Bidding

6000 Lake Forrest Dr., Suite 315, Atlanta, GA, US, 30328
Last Update: 2025-11-28
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.pubwise.io/managed-wrapper

Publishes see an average 65% increase in revenue using PubWise Managed Wrapper solution. A header bidding wrapper is a Javascript tag that lives on the publisher’s site and makes asynchronous calls to multiple demand partners and manages the parameters for managing the real-time auction. PubWise offers complete header bidding management customized to your specific needs. Clients get access to a dedicated Customer Success Manager to ensure a worry-free implementation. But what really sets PubWise apart is SPOT. The AML technology used to optimize publisher revenue beyond human capability.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Argus Observer

1160 SW 4th St, Ontario, Oregon, 97914, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799
http://www.argusobserver.com

The Argus Observer is a direct descendent of a publication called “The Advocate,” originally established Jan. 6, 1897, in Malheur County’s county seat, Vale, Oregon. Partisan in nature, The Advocate supported William Jennings Bryan for president and was owned by E.R. Murray and then W. E. Lees. Twice in its early history, The Advocate attempted a daily publication. The first attempt took place in 1898 and the second in 1904. Between these attempts, The Advocate was moved from Vale to Ontario in 1899. The name of the paper changed to The Ontario Advocate. In 1936, Elmo Smith, who would go on to become Oregon’s governor, established The Eastern Oregon Observer. The publication was founded as a shopper but later became a full-fledged newspaper. Eventually Robert E. Pollock and Jessica Longston owned the paper. The Eastern Oregon Observer operated for 11 years before being consolidated with the Ontario Argus. Bernard Mainwaring and Don Lynch then owned the Ontario Argus. Both publications were printing twice weekly. The subscription lists for both papers were consolidated, and the name of the publication was changed to the Ontario Argus Observer, which ultimately became the Daily Argus Observer and today is known simply as The Argus Observer. A key turning point in the history of the newspaper occurred in 1968 when Wick Communications bought the Argus Observer. The corporation still owns the paper. The first Wick publisher of the newspaper was Fran McLean, who managed the publication for more than 30 years. McLean’s successor, Steve Krehl took over in 1998 and retired in 2009. Krehl still serves on the paper as publisher emeritus. In 2009, John Dillon, a Treasure Valley native, was named publisher to replace Krehl. The newspaper reaches a market in Eastern Oregon and Southwest Idaho consisting of residents living in Malheur County, Oregon and Payette, Adams and Washington counties in Idaho.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 21
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/managedwrapper.jpeg
Header Bidding
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/argus-observer.jpeg
Argus Observer
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Header Bidding
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Argus Observer
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Header Bidding in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Argus Observer in 2025.

Incident History — Header Bidding (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Header Bidding cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Argus Observer (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Argus Observer cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/managedwrapper.jpeg
Header Bidding
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/argus-observer.jpeg
Argus Observer
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Argus Observer company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Header Bidding company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Argus Observer company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Header Bidding company.

In the current year, Argus Observer company and Header Bidding company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Argus Observer company nor Header Bidding company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Argus Observer company nor Header Bidding company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Argus Observer company nor Header Bidding company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Header Bidding company nor Argus Observer company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Header Bidding nor Argus Observer holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Header Bidding company nor Argus Observer company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Neither Header Bidding nor Argus Observer holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Header Bidding nor Argus Observer holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Header Bidding nor Argus Observer holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Header Bidding nor Argus Observer holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Header Bidding nor Argus Observer holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Header Bidding nor Argus Observer holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References