Comparison Overview

Mammoth

VS

Printi

Mammoth

2050 Hardy Parkway St, Columbus, 43123, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11

Formerly Boehm, “Our name change to Mammoth Labels & Packaging better reflects our company’s unique service offerings and focus,” says Stuart Reeve, CEO of Mammoth Labels & Packaging. Mammoth’s focus will now be on label printing and industrial marking and coding solutions. “The energy and refocus of the rebrand will show our customers they are truly associated with a market leader, ready to take their brand and company to the next level,” added Reeve. Mammoth Labels & Packaging, formerly Boehm Inc., has 65 years of servicing the Columbus, Ohio market and has evolved from a leading manufacturer of rubber stamps to a full service flexographic and digital label printer and a distributer of industry leading marking and coding equipment.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 57
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Printi

R. João Ferreira de Camargo, 714, Barueri, SP, 06460-060, BR
Last Update: 2025-12-17

Printi is disrupting the inefficient Brazilian printing market. Utilizing sophisticated technology and the scale of the internet, Printi offers lowest prices, high quality, and a broad product portfolio to corporations of all sizes. Best-in-class customer service is coupled with unrivaled turnaround times to take the experience of producing commercial and marketing materials to a new level.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 485
Subsidiaries: 13
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mammothpackaging.jpeg
Mammoth
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/printi.jpeg
Printi
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Mammoth
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Printi
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mammoth in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Printi in 2025.

Incident History — Mammoth (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mammoth cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Printi (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Printi cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mammothpackaging.jpeg
Mammoth
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/printi.jpeg
Printi
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Printi company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Mammoth company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Printi company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Mammoth company.

In the current year, Printi company and Mammoth company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Printi company nor Mammoth company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Printi company nor Mammoth company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Printi company nor Mammoth company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Mammoth company nor Printi company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Mammoth nor Printi holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Printi company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Mammoth company.

Printi company employs more people globally than Mammoth company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Mammoth nor Printi holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Mammoth nor Printi holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Mammoth nor Printi holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Mammoth nor Printi holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Mammoth nor Printi holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Mammoth nor Printi holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N