Comparison Overview

Malmö stad

VS

State of Tennessee

Malmö stad

August Palms plats 1, Malmö, undefined, 205 80, SE
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 750 and 799

Bli en samhällsbyggare – jobba i Malmö stad! Genom att arbeta i Malmö stad får du möjlighet att arbeta med hållbar samhällsutveckling. Som en samhällsbyggare spelar du en viktig roll i Malmös utveckling och därför ser vi oss som framtidens arbetsplats. Människors lika värde är en förutsättning för demokrati och är också en självklarhet i vår värdegrund. Med 20 000 medarbetare är Malmö stad en av de största arbetsgivarna i Skåne. Vi har över 400 yrkeskategorier representerade inom 22 förvaltningar. Är du intresserad av att jobba hos oss? Se våra lediga tjänster på http://www.malmo.se/jobb

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 13,521
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

State of Tennessee

undefined, undefined, undefined, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

State government is the largest employer in Tennessee, with approximately 43,500 employees in the three branches of government. The State of Tennessee has approximately 1,300 different job classifications in areas such as administrative, health services, historic preservation, legal, agriculture, counseling, and medical. If you are interested in becoming a data scientist, attorney, nurse, wildlife officer, physician, education consultant, trooper, computer programmer or an epidemiologist, explore all of the job opportunities the State of Tennessee has to offer. The State is looking to recruit, retain, and reward a talented workforce through the implementation of a merit-based pay system. Stop back often for news, updates and opportunities -- thanks for visiting!

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 14,624
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/malmo-stad.jpeg
Malmö stad
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/state-of-tennessee.jpeg
State of Tennessee
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Malmö stad
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
State of Tennessee
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Malmö stad in 2025.

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for State of Tennessee in 2025.

Incident History — Malmö stad (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Malmö stad cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — State of Tennessee (X = Date, Y = Severity)

State of Tennessee cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/malmo-stad.jpeg
Malmö stad
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/state-of-tennessee.jpeg
State of Tennessee
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

State of Tennessee company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Malmö stad company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, State of Tennessee company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Malmö stad company.

In the current year, State of Tennessee company and Malmö stad company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither State of Tennessee company nor Malmö stad company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither State of Tennessee company nor Malmö stad company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither State of Tennessee company nor Malmö stad company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Malmö stad company nor State of Tennessee company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Malmö stad nor State of Tennessee holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Malmö stad company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to State of Tennessee company.

State of Tennessee company employs more people globally than Malmö stad company, reflecting its scale as a Government Administration.

Neither Malmö stad nor State of Tennessee holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Malmö stad nor State of Tennessee holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Malmö stad nor State of Tennessee holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Malmö stad nor State of Tennessee holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Malmö stad nor State of Tennessee holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Malmö stad nor State of Tennessee holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H