Comparison Overview

Majid Al Futtaim

VS

Reliance Digital

Majid Al Futtaim

Majid Al Futtaim Tower 1, Dubai, undefined, undefined, AE
Last Update: 2025-11-26

Founded in 1992, Majid Al Futtaim is an Emirati-owned, diversified lifestyle conglomerate operating across the Middle East, Africa and Asia. The Group started from one man’s vision to transform the face of shopping, entertainment, and leisure to ‘Create Great Moments For Everyone, Everyday’. It has since grown into one of the region’s most respected businesses, employing 43,000 people, with owned assets valued at US$18 billion and has the highest credit rating (BBB) among privately held corporates in the region. Majid Al Futtaim owns and operates 29 shopping malls, 7 hotels and four mixed-use communities, welcoming more than 600 million customers through its doors every year.

NAICS: 43
NAICS Definition: Retail Trade
Employees: 24,167
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Reliance Digital

Reliance Digital, Navi Mumbai, IN
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Reliance Digital is a Consumer Electronics, Durables, IT & Telecom retail arm of Reliance Retail Group with more than 1300+ stores across India. Reliance Digital seeks to fulfill the dream of every Indian, be it through its nationwide network of conveniently located stores or through its presence on the web, by providing a delightful shopping experience of products & solutions and helping them bring home the latest & best in technology from the widest selection at the lowest assured price with complete peace of mind through lifelong support. Products purchased from Reliance Digital are backed by Reliance ResQ, a ‘one-stop’ service centre that takes care of all your pre & post purchase service solutions regardless of the brand purchased.

NAICS: 43
NAICS Definition: Retail Trade
Employees: 10,362
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/majid-al-futtaim.jpeg
Majid Al Futtaim
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/reliance-digital-retail-ltd-.jpeg
Reliance Digital
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Majid Al Futtaim
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Reliance Digital
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Majid Al Futtaim in 2025.

Incidents vs Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Reliance Digital in 2025.

Incident History — Majid Al Futtaim (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Majid Al Futtaim cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Reliance Digital (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Reliance Digital cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/majid-al-futtaim.jpeg
Majid Al Futtaim
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/reliance-digital-retail-ltd-.jpeg
Reliance Digital
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Majid Al Futtaim company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Reliance Digital company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Reliance Digital company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Majid Al Futtaim company.

In the current year, Reliance Digital company and Majid Al Futtaim company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Reliance Digital company nor Majid Al Futtaim company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Reliance Digital company nor Majid Al Futtaim company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Reliance Digital company nor Majid Al Futtaim company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Majid Al Futtaim company nor Reliance Digital company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Majid Al Futtaim nor Reliance Digital holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Majid Al Futtaim company nor Reliance Digital company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Majid Al Futtaim company employs more people globally than Reliance Digital company, reflecting its scale as a Retail.

Neither Majid Al Futtaim nor Reliance Digital holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Majid Al Futtaim nor Reliance Digital holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Majid Al Futtaim nor Reliance Digital holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Majid Al Futtaim nor Reliance Digital holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Majid Al Futtaim nor Reliance Digital holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Majid Al Futtaim nor Reliance Digital holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H