Comparison Overview

Maine Cancer Foundation

VS

The Salvation Army

Maine Cancer Foundation

170 US Route 1, Suite 250, Falmouth, 04105, US
Last Update: 2026-01-19
Between 700 and 749

Maine Cancer Foundation is a non-profit organization dedicated to reducing the incidence and mortality of cancer in Maine. We lead a state-wide effort to foster and grow the most promising and effective cancer-fighting efforts available to the people of Maine through a combination of grant-based financial support and coalition building. 100% of the funds we raise stay in Maine.

NAICS: 8135
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

The Salvation Army

615 Slaters, Alexandria, VA, US, 22314
Last Update: 2026-01-24

The Salvation Army is the nation's largest direct provider of social services. Annually, we help millions overcome poverty, addiction, and spiritual and economic hardships by preaching the gospel of Jesus Christ and meeting human needs in His name without discrimination in nearly every zip code. By providing food, shelter, eviction prevention assistance, emergency disaster relief, rehabilitation, after-school and summer youth programs, spiritual enrichment, and more, The Salvation Army is doing the most good at nearly 7,000 centers of operation around the country. The Salvation Army, an international movement, is an evangelical part of the universal Christian church. Its message is based on the Bible. Its ministry is motivated by the love of God. Its mission is to preach the gospel of Jesus Christ and to meet human needs in His name without discrimination.

NAICS: 8135
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 37,620
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mainecancerfoundation.jpeg
Maine Cancer Foundation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/salvationarmyus.jpeg
The Salvation Army
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Maine Cancer Foundation
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Salvation Army
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Non-profit Organizations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Maine Cancer Foundation in 2026.

Incidents vs Non-profit Organizations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Salvation Army in 2026.

Incident History — Maine Cancer Foundation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Maine Cancer Foundation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Salvation Army (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Salvation Army cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mainecancerfoundation.jpeg
Maine Cancer Foundation
Incidents

Date Detected: 7/2020
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/salvationarmyus.jpeg
The Salvation Army
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

The Salvation Army company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Maine Cancer Foundation company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Maine Cancer Foundation company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas The Salvation Army company has not reported any.

In the current year, The Salvation Army company and Maine Cancer Foundation company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Salvation Army company nor Maine Cancer Foundation company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Maine Cancer Foundation company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other The Salvation Army company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither The Salvation Army company nor Maine Cancer Foundation company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Maine Cancer Foundation company nor The Salvation Army company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Maine Cancer Foundation nor The Salvation Army holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

The Salvation Army company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Maine Cancer Foundation company.

The Salvation Army company employs more people globally than Maine Cancer Foundation company, reflecting its scale as a Non-profit Organizations.

Neither Maine Cancer Foundation nor The Salvation Army holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Maine Cancer Foundation nor The Salvation Army holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Maine Cancer Foundation nor The Salvation Army holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Maine Cancer Foundation nor The Salvation Army holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Maine Cancer Foundation nor The Salvation Army holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Maine Cancer Foundation nor The Salvation Army holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.