Comparison Overview

Maine Discovery Museum

VS

Point Cabrillo Lightkeepers Association

Maine Discovery Museum

74 Main Street, Bangor, Maine, 04401, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22

The Maine Discovery Museum (MDM) is a critical regional and state resource with a 20+ year history of serving our community. We have three floors of interactive exhibits, and robust science programming that takes place both within and outside of the museum. In the last ten years MDM has expanded to serve all of Maine, especially in the areas of science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM), through educational outreach and programing, with much of it incorporated into STEAM programming. MDM is a vital community resource for public science education for Mainers from “cradle to gray.”

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Point Cabrillo Lightkeepers Association

45300 Litehouse Rd, Mendocino, California 95460-9736, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

To ensure this national treasure for current and future generations, the mission of the Point Cabrillo Lightkeepers Association is to manage, protect, restore, interpret, and provide public access to the historic Point Cabrillo Light Station State Historic Park, and to assist State Parks in maintenance of the historic structures and gardens. Visit the Point Cabrillo Lighthouse on the Mendocino Coast, just ten minutes south of Fort Bragg, California. The Point Cabrillo Lighthouse is an active aid to navigation, with the original third-order Fresnel Lens still rotating, shining our light out to sea. The Point Cabrillo Lighthouse is volunteer-run and operates under the direction of the PCLK Board. Learn more on our website: http://pointcabrillo.org.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/maine-discovery-museum.jpeg
Maine Discovery Museum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/point-cabrillo-lightkeepers-association.jpeg
Point Cabrillo Lightkeepers Association
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Maine Discovery Museum
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Point Cabrillo Lightkeepers Association
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Maine Discovery Museum in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Point Cabrillo Lightkeepers Association in 2026.

Incident History — Maine Discovery Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Maine Discovery Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Point Cabrillo Lightkeepers Association (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Point Cabrillo Lightkeepers Association cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/maine-discovery-museum.jpeg
Maine Discovery Museum
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/point-cabrillo-lightkeepers-association.jpeg
Point Cabrillo Lightkeepers Association
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Point Cabrillo Lightkeepers Association company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Maine Discovery Museum company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Point Cabrillo Lightkeepers Association company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Maine Discovery Museum company.

In the current year, Point Cabrillo Lightkeepers Association company and Maine Discovery Museum company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Point Cabrillo Lightkeepers Association company nor Maine Discovery Museum company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Point Cabrillo Lightkeepers Association company nor Maine Discovery Museum company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Point Cabrillo Lightkeepers Association company nor Maine Discovery Museum company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Maine Discovery Museum company nor Point Cabrillo Lightkeepers Association company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Maine Discovery Museum nor Point Cabrillo Lightkeepers Association holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Maine Discovery Museum company nor Point Cabrillo Lightkeepers Association company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Maine Discovery Museum company employs more people globally than Point Cabrillo Lightkeepers Association company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Maine Discovery Museum nor Point Cabrillo Lightkeepers Association holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Maine Discovery Museum nor Point Cabrillo Lightkeepers Association holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Maine Discovery Museum nor Point Cabrillo Lightkeepers Association holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Maine Discovery Museum nor Point Cabrillo Lightkeepers Association holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Maine Discovery Museum nor Point Cabrillo Lightkeepers Association holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Maine Discovery Museum nor Point Cabrillo Lightkeepers Association holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N