Comparison Overview

Maine Discovery Museum

VS

Grachtenmuseum Amsterdam

Maine Discovery Museum

74 Main Street, Bangor, Maine, 04401, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.mainediscoverymuseum.org

The Maine Discovery Museum (MDM) is a critical regional and state resource with a 20+ year history of serving our community. We have three floors of interactive exhibits, and robust science programming that takes place both within and outside of the museum. In the last ten years MDM has expanded to serve all of Maine, especially in the areas of science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM), through educational outreach and programing, with much of it incorporated into STEAM programming. MDM is a vital community resource for public science education for Mainers from “cradle to gray.”

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Grachtenmuseum Amsterdam

Herengracht 386, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, NL, 1016 CJ
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799
http://www.grachten.museum

Leer op avontuurlijke wijze de geschiedenis van Amsterdam en de grachten kennen. Het Grachtenmuseum is gevestigd in een zeventiende-eeuws grachtenhuis aan de Herengracht, met klassieke stijlkamers, een vaste multimediale tour, een grachtentuin en wisselende tentoonstellingen. The museum is situated in a monumental building on the Herengracht, where you are taken on a whirlwind journey through four hundred years of history. The Museum of the Canals shows you not only why the creation of the Amsterdam canals was so unusual, but also why they are still special today. This museum is for everyone who loves or is just about to fall in love with the city of Amsterdam. A journey through the Amsterdam canals begins here in the Museum of the Canals.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/maine-discovery-museum.jpeg
Maine Discovery Museum
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/grachten-museum.jpeg
Grachtenmuseum Amsterdam
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Maine Discovery Museum
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Grachtenmuseum Amsterdam
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Maine Discovery Museum in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Grachtenmuseum Amsterdam in 2026.

Incident History — Maine Discovery Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Maine Discovery Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Grachtenmuseum Amsterdam (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Grachtenmuseum Amsterdam cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/maine-discovery-museum.jpeg
Maine Discovery Museum
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/grachten-museum.jpeg
Grachtenmuseum Amsterdam
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Maine Discovery Museum company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Grachtenmuseum Amsterdam company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Grachtenmuseum Amsterdam company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Maine Discovery Museum company.

In the current year, Grachtenmuseum Amsterdam company and Maine Discovery Museum company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Grachtenmuseum Amsterdam company nor Maine Discovery Museum company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Grachtenmuseum Amsterdam company nor Maine Discovery Museum company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Grachtenmuseum Amsterdam company nor Maine Discovery Museum company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Maine Discovery Museum company nor Grachtenmuseum Amsterdam company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Maine Discovery Museum nor Grachtenmuseum Amsterdam holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Maine Discovery Museum company nor Grachtenmuseum Amsterdam company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Maine Discovery Museum company employs more people globally than Grachtenmuseum Amsterdam company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Maine Discovery Museum nor Grachtenmuseum Amsterdam holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Maine Discovery Museum nor Grachtenmuseum Amsterdam holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Maine Discovery Museum nor Grachtenmuseum Amsterdam holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Maine Discovery Museum nor Grachtenmuseum Amsterdam holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Maine Discovery Museum nor Grachtenmuseum Amsterdam holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Maine Discovery Museum nor Grachtenmuseum Amsterdam holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References