Comparison Overview

Main Line Health

VS

Cedars-Sinai

Main Line Health

Radnor Chester Rd, None, Radnor Township, Pennsylvania, US, None
Last Update: 2025-12-17

For all things careers: linktr.ee/mainlinehealthcareers 🏥💼 Make sure to follow @mainlinehealthcareers on Instagram & Facebook to see life at Main Line Health through the lens of our employees. Main Line Health (MLH) is a not-for-profit health system serving portions of Philadelphia and its western suburbs. At its core are four of the region’s respected acute care hospitals—Lankenau Medical Center, Bryn Mawr Hospital, Paoli Hospital and Riddle Hospital—as well as one of the nation’s premier facilities for rehabilitative medicine, Bryn Mawr Rehabilitation Hospital; Mirmont Treatment Center and Main Line Health HomeCare & Hospice. MLH also consists of multi-specialty physician networks, Lankenau Institute for Medical Research- non-profit biomedical research organization. It also comprises six outpatient health centers located in Broomall, Collegeville, Concordville, Exton, Newtown Square and King of Prussia. Our employees speak highly of the work environment at Main Line Health. We offer great opportunities for advancement as well as flexible schedules that allow you to balance your personal and professional life. It is the policy of Main Line Health: to provide Equal Employment Opportunity to all people in all aspects of employer/employee relations without discrimination because of race, religion, color, sex (including pregnancy, gender identity, gender expression, and sexual orientation), parental status, national origin, ancestry, age, disability, political affiliation, military service, relationship status, or other non-merit based factors; to select, develop and promote employees based on the individual’s, qualifications, experience, and job performance; to maintain a working environment free of all forms of discrimination, harassment, and intimidation.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 8,538
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Cedars-Sinai

8700 Beverly Blvd., Los Angeles, CA, US, 90048
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Since its beginning in 1902, Cedars-Sinai has evolved to meet the healthcare needs of one of the most diverse regions in the nation, continually setting new standards for quality and innovation in patient care, research, teaching and community service. Today, Cedars-Sinai is widely known for its national leadership in transforming healthcare for the benefit of patients. Cedars-Sinai receives consistent recognition for our excellence. Our awards include; being named one of America’s Best Hospitals by U.S. News & World Report, receiving the National Research Corporation’s Consumer Choice Award 19 years in a row for providing the highest-quality medical care in Los Angeles, achieving the longest-running Magnet designation for nursing excellence in California, and being recognized as The Advisory Board Company’s 2017 Workplace of the Year, an award Cedars-Sinai has won three years in a row. This annual award recognizes hospitals and health systems nationwide that have outstanding levels of employee engagement. Cedars-Sinai is a leader in the clinical care and research of heart disease, cancer and brain disorders, among other areas. Pioneering research achievements include using cardiac stem cells to repair damaged hearts, developing minimally invasive surgical techniques and discovering new types of drugs to target cancer more precisely. Cedars-Sinai also impacts the future of healthcare through education programs that encompass everything from highly competitive medical residency and fellowship programs to a biomedical science and translational medicine PhD program, advanced training for nurses and educational opportunities for allied health professionals. Most notably, Cedars-Sinai demonstrates a longstanding commitment to strengthening the Los Angeles community through wide-ranging programs that improve the health of its most vulnerable residents.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 16,097
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/main-line-health.jpeg
Main Line Health
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cedars-sinai-medical-center.jpeg
Cedars-Sinai
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Main Line Health
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Cedars-Sinai
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

Main Line Health has 19.05% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cedars-Sinai in 2025.

Incident History — Main Line Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Main Line Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Cedars-Sinai (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cedars-Sinai cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/main-line-health.jpeg
Main Line Health
Incidents

Date Detected: 4/2025
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 4/2024
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cedars-sinai-medical-center.jpeg
Cedars-Sinai
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2014
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Theft of Laptop
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Cedars-Sinai company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Main Line Health company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Main Line Health company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Cedars-Sinai company.

In the current year, Main Line Health company has reported more cyber incidents than Cedars-Sinai company.

Main Line Health company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Cedars-Sinai company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Cedars-Sinai company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Main Line Health company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Cedars-Sinai company nor Main Line Health company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Main Line Health company nor Cedars-Sinai company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Main Line Health nor Cedars-Sinai holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Cedars-Sinai company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Main Line Health company.

Cedars-Sinai company employs more people globally than Main Line Health company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither Main Line Health nor Cedars-Sinai holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Main Line Health nor Cedars-Sinai holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Main Line Health nor Cedars-Sinai holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Main Line Health nor Cedars-Sinai holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Main Line Health nor Cedars-Sinai holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Main Line Health nor Cedars-Sinai holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N