Comparison Overview

Main Line Health

VS

Baylor Scott & White Health

Main Line Health

Radnor Chester Rd, None, Radnor Township, Pennsylvania, US, None
Last Update: 2025-12-17

For all things careers: linktr.ee/mainlinehealthcareers 🏥💼 Make sure to follow @mainlinehealthcareers on Instagram & Facebook to see life at Main Line Health through the lens of our employees. Main Line Health (MLH) is a not-for-profit health system serving portions of Philadelphia and its western suburbs. At its core are four of the region’s respected acute care hospitals—Lankenau Medical Center, Bryn Mawr Hospital, Paoli Hospital and Riddle Hospital—as well as one of the nation’s premier facilities for rehabilitative medicine, Bryn Mawr Rehabilitation Hospital; Mirmont Treatment Center and Main Line Health HomeCare & Hospice. MLH also consists of multi-specialty physician networks, Lankenau Institute for Medical Research- non-profit biomedical research organization. It also comprises six outpatient health centers located in Broomall, Collegeville, Concordville, Exton, Newtown Square and King of Prussia. Our employees speak highly of the work environment at Main Line Health. We offer great opportunities for advancement as well as flexible schedules that allow you to balance your personal and professional life. It is the policy of Main Line Health: to provide Equal Employment Opportunity to all people in all aspects of employer/employee relations without discrimination because of race, religion, color, sex (including pregnancy, gender identity, gender expression, and sexual orientation), parental status, national origin, ancestry, age, disability, political affiliation, military service, relationship status, or other non-merit based factors; to select, develop and promote employees based on the individual’s, qualifications, experience, and job performance; to maintain a working environment free of all forms of discrimination, harassment, and intimidation.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 8,538
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Baylor Scott & White Health

3500 Gaston Ave, Dallas, Texas, 75246, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

With us by your side, there's no stopping you. It's why we're creating a new kind of healthcare at Baylor Scott & White. And we're just getting started. As the largest not-for-profit health system in the state of Texas, Baylor Scott & White promotes the health and well-being of every individual, family and community it serves. It is committed to making quality care more accessible, convenient and affordable through its integrated delivery network, which includes the Baylor Scott & White Health Plan, Baylor Scott & White Research Institute, the Baylor Scott & White Quality Alliance and its leading digital health platform — MyBSWHealth. Through 52 hospitals and more than 1,300 access points, including flagship academic medical centers in Dallas, Fort Worth and Temple, the system offers the full continuum of care, from primary to award-winning specialty care. Founded as a Christian ministry of healing more than a century ago, Baylor Scott & White today serves more than three million Texans. For more information visit: BSWHealth.com.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 28,429
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/main-line-health.jpeg
Main Line Health
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bswhealth.jpeg
Baylor Scott & White Health
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Main Line Health
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Baylor Scott & White Health
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

Main Line Health has 19.05% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Baylor Scott & White Health in 2025.

Incident History — Main Line Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Main Line Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Baylor Scott & White Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Baylor Scott & White Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/main-line-health.jpeg
Main Line Health
Incidents

Date Detected: 4/2025
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 4/2024
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bswhealth.jpeg
Baylor Scott & White Health
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Baylor Scott & White Health company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Main Line Health company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Main Line Health company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Baylor Scott & White Health company has not reported any.

In the current year, Main Line Health company has reported more cyber incidents than Baylor Scott & White Health company.

Main Line Health company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Baylor Scott & White Health company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Baylor Scott & White Health company nor Main Line Health company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Baylor Scott & White Health company nor Main Line Health company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Main Line Health company nor Baylor Scott & White Health company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Main Line Health nor Baylor Scott & White Health holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Main Line Health company nor Baylor Scott & White Health company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Baylor Scott & White Health company employs more people globally than Main Line Health company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither Main Line Health nor Baylor Scott & White Health holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Main Line Health nor Baylor Scott & White Health holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Main Line Health nor Baylor Scott & White Health holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Main Line Health nor Baylor Scott & White Health holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Main Line Health nor Baylor Scott & White Health holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Main Line Health nor Baylor Scott & White Health holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N