Comparison Overview

Main Graphics

VS

Allied Envelope Printing and Graphics

Main Graphics

15321 Barranca Parkway, Irvine, 92618, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.maingraphics.net

Main Graphics has been serving the graphic communication needs of businesses for the last 20+ years. Our focus has always been on driving the marketing success of our clients. We realize today more than ever before that our success is based solely on our ability to help our clients and their companies improve performance. Through the utilization of our On-demand Marketing Technology we help clients manage costs and drive greater efficiencies. Our use of technology provides streamlined procurement of print and marketing materials, timely distribution, true levels of inventory, analytic data, and ability to create unique marketing related products to target clients. Main Graphics drives to save bottom line costs and drive top line revenue and sales opportunities.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 25
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Allied Envelope Printing and Graphics

634 N. Five Mile Road, Boise, IDAHO, 83713, US
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799
http://www.allied-envelope.com

Allied Envelope Printing and Graphics is one the Northwest's premier printers and designers of quality envelope products. With locations in Boise, Idaho and Spokane, Washington, we have been an industry leader in quality printed products for over 30 years. We also support sustainablility efforts by providing a full line of recycled and recylable products, print using soy based inks and utlize 99% chemical-free processing. Please contact us with any requests for additional information via our website at www.allied-envelope.com.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 17
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/main-graphics.jpeg
Main Graphics
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/allied-envelope-company.jpeg
Allied Envelope Printing and Graphics
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Main Graphics
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Allied Envelope Printing and Graphics
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Main Graphics in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Allied Envelope Printing and Graphics in 2025.

Incident History — Main Graphics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Main Graphics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Allied Envelope Printing and Graphics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Allied Envelope Printing and Graphics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/main-graphics.jpeg
Main Graphics
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/allied-envelope-company.jpeg
Allied Envelope Printing and Graphics
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Main Graphics company and Allied Envelope Printing and Graphics company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Allied Envelope Printing and Graphics company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Main Graphics company.

In the current year, Allied Envelope Printing and Graphics company and Main Graphics company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Allied Envelope Printing and Graphics company nor Main Graphics company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Allied Envelope Printing and Graphics company nor Main Graphics company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Allied Envelope Printing and Graphics company nor Main Graphics company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Main Graphics company nor Allied Envelope Printing and Graphics company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Main Graphics nor Allied Envelope Printing and Graphics holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Main Graphics company nor Allied Envelope Printing and Graphics company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Main Graphics company employs more people globally than Allied Envelope Printing and Graphics company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Main Graphics nor Allied Envelope Printing and Graphics holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Main Graphics nor Allied Envelope Printing and Graphics holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Main Graphics nor Allied Envelope Printing and Graphics holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Main Graphics nor Allied Envelope Printing and Graphics holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Main Graphics nor Allied Envelope Printing and Graphics holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Main Graphics nor Allied Envelope Printing and Graphics holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References