Comparison Overview

Magnolia Plantation & Gardens

VS

Zoo New England

Magnolia Plantation & Gardens

29414, US
Last Update: 2026-03-18
View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.magnoliaplantation.com

The nation's last surviving large-scale romantic gardens this property began in earnest as a substantial working rice plantation in the colonial era. Today visitors from around the globe flock to Magnolia, as they have since 1869, to revel in the beauty of her gardens and learn something of the flora & fauna of the Lowcountry region. In the last few years Magnolia has entered into a new phase of the plantation's history with the initiation of an ambitious project in African-American history. From Slavery to Freedom is a program designed to acknowledge the genius of thousands of enslaved Africans brought to the Lowcountry. Bringing with them their know-how and rich folkways these people would shape the culture of our region in ways we are only now coming to comprehend.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 27
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Zoo New England

1 Franklin Park Rd, Boston, 02121, US
Last Update: 2026-03-23
Between 750 and 799
http://zoonewengland.org/

Zoo New England's mission is to inspire people to protect and sustain the natural world for future generations by creating fun and engaging experiences that integrate wildlife and conservation programs, research, and education. Commonwealth Zoological Corporation D/B/A Zoo New England ("Zoo New England"​) is the private, non-profit corporation that operates Franklin Park Zoo in Boston and Stone Zoo in Stoneham, Massachusetts. Zoo New England programming is made possible through earned revenues and state, private, and corporate funding.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 218
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Magnolia Plantation & Gardens
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/zoo-new-england.jpeg
Zoo New England
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Magnolia Plantation & Gardens
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Zoo New England
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Magnolia Plantation & Gardens in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Zoo New England in 2026.

Incident History — Magnolia Plantation & Gardens (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Magnolia Plantation & Gardens cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Zoo New England (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Zoo New England cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Magnolia Plantation & Gardens
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/zoo-new-england.jpeg
Zoo New England
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Magnolia Plantation & Gardens company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Zoo New England company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Zoo New England company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Magnolia Plantation & Gardens company.

In the current year, Zoo New England company and Magnolia Plantation & Gardens company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Zoo New England company nor Magnolia Plantation & Gardens company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Zoo New England company nor Magnolia Plantation & Gardens company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Zoo New England company nor Magnolia Plantation & Gardens company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Magnolia Plantation & Gardens company nor Zoo New England company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Magnolia Plantation & Gardens nor Zoo New England holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Magnolia Plantation & Gardens company nor Zoo New England company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Zoo New England company employs more people globally than Magnolia Plantation & Gardens company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Magnolia Plantation & Gardens nor Zoo New England holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Magnolia Plantation & Gardens nor Zoo New England holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Magnolia Plantation & Gardens nor Zoo New England holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Magnolia Plantation & Gardens nor Zoo New England holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Magnolia Plantation & Gardens nor Zoo New England holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Magnolia Plantation & Gardens nor Zoo New England holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.3.0, two peer-facing consensus request handlers assume that the history index is always available and call blockchain.history_store.history_index().unwrap() directly. That assumption is false by construction. HistoryStoreProxy::history_index() explicitly returns None for the valid HistoryStoreProxy::WithoutIndex state. when a full node is syncing or otherwise running without the history index, a remote peer can send RequestTransactionsProof or RequestTransactionReceiptsByAddress and trigger an Option::unwrap() panic on the request path. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.0.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, OAuthManager.validate_token() returns True for any token not found in its internal store, which is empty by default. Any HTTP request to the MCP server with an arbitrary Bearer token is treated as authenticated, granting full access to all registered tools and agent capabilities. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, the PraisonAI Gateway server accepts WebSocket connections at /ws and serves agent topology at /info with no authentication. Any network client can connect, enumerate registered agents, and send arbitrary messages to agents and their tool sets. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.90, MCPToolIndex.search_tools() compiles a caller-supplied string directly as a Python regular expression with no validation, sanitization, or timeout. A crafted regex causes catastrophic backtracking in the re engine, blocking the Python thread for hundreds of seconds and causing a complete service outage. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.90.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References