Comparison Overview

Magnolia Bluffs Casino Hotel

VS

TPI

Magnolia Bluffs Casino Hotel

7 Roth Hill Rd, Natchez, MS, 39120, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Magnolia Bluffs Casino is a full-service gaming facility with approx. 500 of the newest slot machines, 12 table games including live craps and roulette, poker room, sportsbook and multiple dining venues. The nearby hotel boasts 141 rooms, banquet facility and a full suite of amenities including a bar, breakfast, salt water pool featuring a seating area with a fire pit and more. Located on the Mississippi River in historic downtown Natchez, Magnolia Bluffs Casino sits on the site of the former Learneds Mill, a saw mill that opened in 1828 and operated until 1962. The casino opened its doors on Dec 19, 2012. The facility is owned and operated by Premier Gaming Group, Union, KY.

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 69
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

TPI

2600 Gannett Ave, Des Moines, Iowa, 50321, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Casino born and bred. Every TPI product is rooted in our gaming DNA. TPI’s digital mobile solutions are created and informed by real-world experience. And with seamless integration to TPI’s industry-leading, world-class direct mail process, you can automatically extend all your player communications across multiple platforms, effortlessly. From cashless gaming to mobile apps, kiosk integrations and beyond. All backed by customer service and dedication to the mission.

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 146
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/magnolia-bluffs-casino.jpeg
Magnolia Bluffs Casino Hotel
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tpi-the-printer-inc.jpeg
TPI
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Magnolia Bluffs Casino Hotel
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
TPI
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Magnolia Bluffs Casino Hotel in 2025.

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TPI in 2025.

Incident History — Magnolia Bluffs Casino Hotel (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Magnolia Bluffs Casino Hotel cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — TPI (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TPI cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/magnolia-bluffs-casino.jpeg
Magnolia Bluffs Casino Hotel
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tpi-the-printer-inc.jpeg
TPI
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Magnolia Bluffs Casino Hotel company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to TPI company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, TPI company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Magnolia Bluffs Casino Hotel company.

In the current year, TPI company and Magnolia Bluffs Casino Hotel company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither TPI company nor Magnolia Bluffs Casino Hotel company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither TPI company nor Magnolia Bluffs Casino Hotel company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither TPI company nor Magnolia Bluffs Casino Hotel company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Magnolia Bluffs Casino Hotel company nor TPI company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Magnolia Bluffs Casino Hotel nor TPI holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Magnolia Bluffs Casino Hotel company nor TPI company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

TPI company employs more people globally than Magnolia Bluffs Casino Hotel company, reflecting its scale as a Gambling Facilities and Casinos.

Neither Magnolia Bluffs Casino Hotel nor TPI holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Magnolia Bluffs Casino Hotel nor TPI holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Magnolia Bluffs Casino Hotel nor TPI holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Magnolia Bluffs Casino Hotel nor TPI holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Magnolia Bluffs Casino Hotel nor TPI holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Magnolia Bluffs Casino Hotel nor TPI holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H