Comparison Overview

Madinger GmbH Industry Services

VS

Diamondback Technology, Inc.

Madinger GmbH Industry Services

Madinger GmbH, Euerbach/Schweinfurt, 97502, DE
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Als Systemdienstleister mit langjähriger Erfahrung in den unterschiedlichsten Branchen steht für uns eines im Mittelpunkt: die Anforderung unserer Industriekunden! Mit unserem individuell verknüpfbaren Leistungsspektrum bestehend aus den Geschäftsfeldern Wärmebehandlung, Zerstörungsfreie Materialprüfung, Produktionsnahe Dienstleistungen, Supply Chain Support sowie einem Säge- & Logistikzentrum bieten wir passgenaue Lösungen an. Die Madinger-Gruppe bietet Qualität, Flexibilität und einen hohen Leistungsanspruch und steht den Kunden als zuverlässiger Partner im Wertschöpfungsprozess zur Seite. Die Grundlage dafür bilden ein moderner Maschinenpark und rund 600 qualifizierte Mitarbeiter weltweit. Neben der Unternehmenszentrale in Euerbach ist Madinger mit den kundennahen Standorten in Schweinfurt, Fürth und Kitzingen sowie mit Tochtergesellschaften in der Slowakei, Rumänien und China vertreten. Mehr Informationen finden Sie unter www.madinger.com

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 40
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Diamondback Technology, Inc.

None
Last Update:

We predict bulk material handling and processing problems while your plant is still on the drawing board or solve material hangup problems in existing plants with economical retrofit recommendations and process modifications. Diamondback Technology's bins, hoppers, blenders, feeders and auxiliary equipment designs are based on sound engineering principles and proven field experience. We are the exclusive source of Dr. Jerry R. Johanson's unique problem-solving designs collectively known as Diamondback Technology. Our company is committed to excellence. We strive to be number one in technology, service and satisfaction.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/madinger-gmbh-industry-services.jpeg
Madinger GmbH Industry Services
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/diamondback-technology-inc..jpeg
Diamondback Technology, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Madinger GmbH Industry Services
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Diamondback Technology, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Madinger GmbH Industry Services in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Diamondback Technology, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — Madinger GmbH Industry Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Madinger GmbH Industry Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Diamondback Technology, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Diamondback Technology, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/madinger-gmbh-industry-services.jpeg
Madinger GmbH Industry Services
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/diamondback-technology-inc..jpeg
Diamondback Technology, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Madinger GmbH Industry Services company and Diamondback Technology, Inc. company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Diamondback Technology, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Madinger GmbH Industry Services company.

In the current year, Diamondback Technology, Inc. company and Madinger GmbH Industry Services company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Diamondback Technology, Inc. company nor Madinger GmbH Industry Services company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Diamondback Technology, Inc. company nor Madinger GmbH Industry Services company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Diamondback Technology, Inc. company nor Madinger GmbH Industry Services company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Madinger GmbH Industry Services company nor Diamondback Technology, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Madinger GmbH Industry Services nor Diamondback Technology, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Madinger GmbH Industry Services company nor Diamondback Technology, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Madinger GmbH Industry Services company employs more people globally than Diamondback Technology, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither Madinger GmbH Industry Services nor Diamondback Technology, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Madinger GmbH Industry Services nor Diamondback Technology, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Madinger GmbH Industry Services nor Diamondback Technology, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Madinger GmbH Industry Services nor Diamondback Technology, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Madinger GmbH Industry Services nor Diamondback Technology, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Madinger GmbH Industry Services nor Diamondback Technology, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H