Comparison Overview

Madinger GmbH Industry Services

VS

Boplan Group

Madinger GmbH Industry Services

Madinger GmbH, Euerbach/Schweinfurt, 97502, DE
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Als Systemdienstleister mit langjähriger Erfahrung in den unterschiedlichsten Branchen steht für uns eines im Mittelpunkt: die Anforderung unserer Industriekunden! Mit unserem individuell verknüpfbaren Leistungsspektrum bestehend aus den Geschäftsfeldern Wärmebehandlung, Zerstörungsfreie Materialprüfung, Produktionsnahe Dienstleistungen, Supply Chain Support sowie einem Säge- & Logistikzentrum bieten wir passgenaue Lösungen an. Die Madinger-Gruppe bietet Qualität, Flexibilität und einen hohen Leistungsanspruch und steht den Kunden als zuverlässiger Partner im Wertschöpfungsprozess zur Seite. Die Grundlage dafür bilden ein moderner Maschinenpark und rund 600 qualifizierte Mitarbeiter weltweit. Neben der Unternehmenszentrale in Euerbach ist Madinger mit den kundennahen Standorten in Schweinfurt, Fürth und Kitzingen sowie mit Tochtergesellschaften in der Slowakei, Rumänien und China vertreten. Mehr Informationen finden Sie unter www.madinger.com

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 40
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Boplan Group

Muizelstraat 12, Moorsele, West-Vlaanderen, 8560, BE
Last Update:
Between 750 and 799

Boplan® designs and manufactures durable and extremely efficient traffic safety barriers, guardrails, handrails and other safety products with a focus to offer optimal protection to people, buildings and other infrastructure. Our innovative polymer-based #FlexImpact safety barriers, guardrails and handrails are as strong as traditional steel products. However they actually absorb accidental impacts so that paint jobs, repairs or replacements become a thing of the past. Our advanced technology makes our safety barriers flexible, so that they return to their original state after impact! Our systems are fully modular, independently tested to exceed the strictest standards and have been validated by thousands of customers in warehouses, production halls, airports, drilling platforms and (petro) chemical sites.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 81
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/madinger-gmbh-industry-services.jpeg
Madinger GmbH Industry Services
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/boplan.jpeg
Boplan Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Madinger GmbH Industry Services
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Boplan Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Madinger GmbH Industry Services in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Boplan Group in 2025.

Incident History — Madinger GmbH Industry Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Madinger GmbH Industry Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Boplan Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Boplan Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/madinger-gmbh-industry-services.jpeg
Madinger GmbH Industry Services
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/boplan.jpeg
Boplan Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Madinger GmbH Industry Services company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Boplan Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Boplan Group company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Madinger GmbH Industry Services company.

In the current year, Boplan Group company and Madinger GmbH Industry Services company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Boplan Group company nor Madinger GmbH Industry Services company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Boplan Group company nor Madinger GmbH Industry Services company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Boplan Group company nor Madinger GmbH Industry Services company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Madinger GmbH Industry Services company nor Boplan Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Madinger GmbH Industry Services nor Boplan Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Madinger GmbH Industry Services company nor Boplan Group company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Boplan Group company employs more people globally than Madinger GmbH Industry Services company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither Madinger GmbH Industry Services nor Boplan Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Madinger GmbH Industry Services nor Boplan Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Madinger GmbH Industry Services nor Boplan Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Madinger GmbH Industry Services nor Boplan Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Madinger GmbH Industry Services nor Boplan Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Madinger GmbH Industry Services nor Boplan Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H