Comparison Overview

Madhouse Media Publishing

VS

Other Press

Madhouse Media Publishing

undefined, Port Macquarie, NSW, 2444, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-26

As a writer considering self publishing you need to confront this simple fact. You can’t do it all by yourself. Madhouse Media Publishing was created to help writers like you navigate the difficult technical and creative obstacles you’ll face when you decide to self publish. We can make sure your book has a great cover and layout design and also meets the stringent technical standards for publishing on Amazon, Google Play and Apple iBook Store. We can also help design and build your author’s platform and launch your book with a marketing campaign to suit your budget. Check out our starter packages, or contact for an obligation free quotation on your project.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Other Press

2 Park Avenue, New York, NY, 10016, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Other Press attracts authors who are guided by a passion to discover the limits of knowledge and imagination. We publish novels, short stories, poetry, and essays from America and around the world that represent literature at its best. Our nonfiction books–should they be history, current events, popular culture or memoir–explore how psychic, cultural, historical, and literary shifts inform our vision of the world and of each other.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 175
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/madhousemedia.jpeg
Madhouse Media Publishing
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/other-press.jpeg
Other Press
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Madhouse Media Publishing
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Other Press
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Madhouse Media Publishing in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Other Press in 2025.

Incident History — Madhouse Media Publishing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Madhouse Media Publishing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Other Press (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Other Press cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/madhousemedia.jpeg
Madhouse Media Publishing
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/other-press.jpeg
Other Press
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Madhouse Media Publishing company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Other Press company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Other Press company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Madhouse Media Publishing company.

In the current year, Other Press company and Madhouse Media Publishing company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Other Press company nor Madhouse Media Publishing company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Other Press company nor Madhouse Media Publishing company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Other Press company nor Madhouse Media Publishing company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Madhouse Media Publishing company nor Other Press company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Madhouse Media Publishing nor Other Press holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Madhouse Media Publishing company nor Other Press company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Other Press company employs more people globally than Madhouse Media Publishing company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Madhouse Media Publishing nor Other Press holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Madhouse Media Publishing nor Other Press holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Madhouse Media Publishing nor Other Press holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Madhouse Media Publishing nor Other Press holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Madhouse Media Publishing nor Other Press holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Madhouse Media Publishing nor Other Press holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.