Comparison Overview

MacNamara King Solicitors

VS

CenterPeak LLC

MacNamara King Solicitors

61 Coten End, Warwick, Warwickshire, CV34 4NU, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

We are a friendly and reliable firm of solicitors based in Warwick with a branch office in Balsall Common. We specialise in many areas of law from commercial litigation to residential conveyancing. Please have a look at our services page or visit our website for more information. Alternatively, please do give us a call your particular legal issues.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

CenterPeak LLC

None, None, New York, NY, US, None
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

CenterPeak LLC is the world’s premier legal search firm, renowned for its expertise in strategic expansion and high-impact partner and practice group placements. Formed through the transformative merger of Johnson Downie and Lippman Jungers, CenterPeak is the leading advisor to the legal elite, with a track record of placing over 2,000 partners and opening more than 40 offices for Am Law 50 firms. CenterPeak is the trusted search partner for the world’s most prestigious law firms, delivering strategic growth through exceptional service and expertise in the most complex and cutting-edge deals. The CenterPeak team is composed of the industry’s top recruiters, supported by a unique platform that empowers us to recruit, develop, and retain the best talent, ensuring industry-leading performance and compensation.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 34
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/macnamara-king-solicitors.jpeg
MacNamara King Solicitors
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/centerpeakllc.jpeg
CenterPeak LLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
MacNamara King Solicitors
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
CenterPeak LLC
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MacNamara King Solicitors in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CenterPeak LLC in 2025.

Incident History — MacNamara King Solicitors (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MacNamara King Solicitors cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — CenterPeak LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CenterPeak LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/macnamara-king-solicitors.jpeg
MacNamara King Solicitors
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/centerpeakllc.jpeg
CenterPeak LLC
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both MacNamara King Solicitors company and CenterPeak LLC company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, CenterPeak LLC company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to MacNamara King Solicitors company.

In the current year, CenterPeak LLC company and MacNamara King Solicitors company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither CenterPeak LLC company nor MacNamara King Solicitors company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither CenterPeak LLC company nor MacNamara King Solicitors company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither CenterPeak LLC company nor MacNamara King Solicitors company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither MacNamara King Solicitors company nor CenterPeak LLC company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither MacNamara King Solicitors nor CenterPeak LLC holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither MacNamara King Solicitors company nor CenterPeak LLC company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

CenterPeak LLC company employs more people globally than MacNamara King Solicitors company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither MacNamara King Solicitors nor CenterPeak LLC holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither MacNamara King Solicitors nor CenterPeak LLC holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither MacNamara King Solicitors nor CenterPeak LLC holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither MacNamara King Solicitors nor CenterPeak LLC holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither MacNamara King Solicitors nor CenterPeak LLC holds HIPAA certification.

Neither MacNamara King Solicitors nor CenterPeak LLC holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X