Comparison Overview

Mackay Chapman

VS

Frank, Frank & Scherr, LLC

Mackay Chapman

Level 2, Bank House, Melbourne, Victoria, 3000, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Mackay Chapman is a specialist, boutique legal and advisory firm that stands apart in a crowded marketplace because we are free from the constraints of other professional services firms – from rigid structure and inflexible ways, from the burden of the contemporary law firm model, from commercial conflicts and internal distractions – free to focus on you, learn about you, understand your problem and then solve it.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Frank, Frank & Scherr, LLC

1400 Front Avenue, Suite 200, Lutherville, MD, US, 21093
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Frank, Frank & Scherr LLC focuses its practice on elder law, special needs trust planning, estate planning and estate administration. The firm handles a vast array of issues confronting seniors and individuals with disabilities including Medical Assistance planning and asset protection in the event that long term care is needed. Our firm understands that spouses, children, friends and other close relatives may be involved in assisting their loved ones. Our attorneys are experienced in working with family and friends in gathering the needed documentation, advocating on their behalf and facilitating communication, while ensuring that the client is making the decisions to the extent he or she is capable of doing so. Toll Free 1.888.338.0400 1400 Front Avenue, Suite 200, Lutherville, Maryland 21093 Phone: 410.337.8900 Fax: 410.337.0031 208 East Dover Street Easton, Maryland 21601 Phone 1.888.338.0400 Fax 410.337.0031 10211 Wincopin Circle, Suite 600 Columbia, Maryland 21044

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mackaylawyers&advisors.jpeg
Mackay Chapman
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/frank-frank-&-scherr.jpeg
Frank, Frank & Scherr, LLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Mackay Chapman
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Frank, Frank & Scherr, LLC
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mackay Chapman in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Frank, Frank & Scherr, LLC in 2025.

Incident History — Mackay Chapman (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mackay Chapman cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Frank, Frank & Scherr, LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Frank, Frank & Scherr, LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mackaylawyers&advisors.jpeg
Mackay Chapman
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/frank-frank-&-scherr.jpeg
Frank, Frank & Scherr, LLC
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Frank, Frank & Scherr, LLC company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Mackay Chapman company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Frank, Frank & Scherr, LLC company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Mackay Chapman company.

In the current year, Frank, Frank & Scherr, LLC company and Mackay Chapman company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Frank, Frank & Scherr, LLC company nor Mackay Chapman company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Frank, Frank & Scherr, LLC company nor Mackay Chapman company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Frank, Frank & Scherr, LLC company nor Mackay Chapman company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Mackay Chapman company nor Frank, Frank & Scherr, LLC company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Mackay Chapman nor Frank, Frank & Scherr, LLC holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Mackay Chapman company nor Frank, Frank & Scherr, LLC company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Frank, Frank & Scherr, LLC company employs more people globally than Mackay Chapman company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Mackay Chapman nor Frank, Frank & Scherr, LLC holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Mackay Chapman nor Frank, Frank & Scherr, LLC holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Mackay Chapman nor Frank, Frank & Scherr, LLC holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Mackay Chapman nor Frank, Frank & Scherr, LLC holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Mackay Chapman nor Frank, Frank & Scherr, LLC holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Mackay Chapman nor Frank, Frank & Scherr, LLC holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X