Comparison Overview

Machine Covers Ltd

VS

Grupo SIGA

Machine Covers Ltd

Stancombe Works, Stroud Road , Bisley , GL6 7NQ, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Our extensive product range includes concertina covers, industrial roller blinds, static covers and flexible connections, steel telescopic slideway covers and robot covers. We also offer health and safety consultancy and engineering services, including safety audits and risk assessments, as well as a full range of machine safety guarding solutions. Most types of safety guarding and electrical interlocks are stock items. With experience working across a wide range of industries, we are able to fully understand your individual requirements. Our personal and flexible approach enables us to achieve your exact objectives.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Grupo SIGA

None
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Somos un grupo mexicano que nos apasiona estar cerca de nuestros clientes; nuestra seriedad y dinamismo han logrado combinar un servicio único logrando así resultados que generan avance y rentabilidad. En Grupo SIGA, promovemos el desarrollo de las empresas a través de la innovación. Nos involucramos en áreas de automatización e integración de procesos, asesoría y mantenimiento, construcción de obras eléctricas y civiles, además de maquinado de piezas y pailería. Así mismo, contamos con un departamento enfocado al desarrollo de proyectos en el área sustentable.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 32
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/machine-covers.jpeg
Machine Covers Ltd
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/grupo-siga.jpeg
Grupo SIGA
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Machine Covers Ltd
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Grupo SIGA
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Machine Covers Ltd in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Grupo SIGA in 2025.

Incident History — Machine Covers Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Machine Covers Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Grupo SIGA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Grupo SIGA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/machine-covers.jpeg
Machine Covers Ltd
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/grupo-siga.jpeg
Grupo SIGA
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Grupo SIGA company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Machine Covers Ltd company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Grupo SIGA company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Machine Covers Ltd company.

In the current year, Grupo SIGA company and Machine Covers Ltd company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Grupo SIGA company nor Machine Covers Ltd company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Grupo SIGA company nor Machine Covers Ltd company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Grupo SIGA company nor Machine Covers Ltd company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Machine Covers Ltd company nor Grupo SIGA company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Machine Covers Ltd nor Grupo SIGA holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Machine Covers Ltd company nor Grupo SIGA company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Grupo SIGA company employs more people globally than Machine Covers Ltd company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither Machine Covers Ltd nor Grupo SIGA holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Machine Covers Ltd nor Grupo SIGA holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Machine Covers Ltd nor Grupo SIGA holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Machine Covers Ltd nor Grupo SIGA holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Machine Covers Ltd nor Grupo SIGA holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Machine Covers Ltd nor Grupo SIGA holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H