Comparison Overview

Machine Covers Ltd

VS

American Industrial Company

Machine Covers Ltd

Stancombe Works, Stroud Road , Bisley , GL6 7NQ, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Our extensive product range includes concertina covers, industrial roller blinds, static covers and flexible connections, steel telescopic slideway covers and robot covers. We also offer health and safety consultancy and engineering services, including safety audits and risk assessments, as well as a full range of machine safety guarding solutions. Most types of safety guarding and electrical interlocks are stock items. With experience working across a wide range of industries, we are able to fully understand your individual requirements. Our personal and flexible approach enables us to achieve your exact objectives.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

American Industrial Company

1080 Tri-State Parkway, Gurnee, IL, 60031, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

American Industrial Company is a manufacturer specializing in precision metal stampings and assemblies. Established in 1981, American Industrial Co. is precise, quality driven manufacturer with the highest attention to ISO 9001:2008 standards. Our company occupies a 25,000 square foot modern building. We are located 30 minutes North of Chicago O'Hare airport. AIC specializes in complete turnkey packages. Everything from helping your company in the design phases of your prototype, to your completed precision metal stampings. A highly dedicated staff enables us to provide to supply chains for worldwide companies. AIC has established ourselves as a leader for short run custom metal stampings.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 17
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/machine-covers.jpeg
Machine Covers Ltd
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/american-industrial-co-.jpeg
American Industrial Company
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Machine Covers Ltd
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
American Industrial Company
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Machine Covers Ltd in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for American Industrial Company in 2025.

Incident History — Machine Covers Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Machine Covers Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — American Industrial Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

American Industrial Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/machine-covers.jpeg
Machine Covers Ltd
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/american-industrial-co-.jpeg
American Industrial Company
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Machine Covers Ltd company and American Industrial Company company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, American Industrial Company company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Machine Covers Ltd company.

In the current year, American Industrial Company company and Machine Covers Ltd company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither American Industrial Company company nor Machine Covers Ltd company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither American Industrial Company company nor Machine Covers Ltd company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither American Industrial Company company nor Machine Covers Ltd company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Machine Covers Ltd company nor American Industrial Company company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Machine Covers Ltd nor American Industrial Company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Machine Covers Ltd company nor American Industrial Company company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

American Industrial Company company employs more people globally than Machine Covers Ltd company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither Machine Covers Ltd nor American Industrial Company holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Machine Covers Ltd nor American Industrial Company holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Machine Covers Ltd nor American Industrial Company holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Machine Covers Ltd nor American Industrial Company holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Machine Covers Ltd nor American Industrial Company holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Machine Covers Ltd nor American Industrial Company holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H