Comparison Overview

Macfarlane Labels Ltd

VS

Flueron Inks P Ltd

Macfarlane Labels Ltd

22 Bentinck Street, Kilmarnock, Scotland, undefined, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-17

With over 40 years of industry experience, Macfarlane Labels are experts in providing high quality Self-Adhesive and Resealable Labels to a wide range of sectors including food, health and beauty, household products, beverages and pharmaceuticals. Macfarlane Labels employs 114 people and supplies 350 customers in the UK, Ireland, Europe, the USA and Canada. Our team of industry experts have earned a strong reputation for the design, printing and supply of high quality self adhesive and resealable labels. Many of the world’s leading manufacturers of FMCG products trust and rely upon Macfarlane Labels as their labels supply partner.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 31
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Flueron Inks P Ltd

A 244, TTC Industrial Area, Navi Mumbai, 400710, IN
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Flueron Inks P.Ltd. A Mumbai based ink manufacturer who believe in Qualitative Service with Quantitative Excellence. Ever since the company opened doors in 1947(V.G Color Industries), they have been able to satisfy customers all around the globe with their perseverance for customer satisfaction. Owned and headed by Mr Nalin Mehta, Flueron Inks, are one of the most reputable and front runner ink companies of the fastest developing economy, India. Their product domain includes Web and Sheetfed Oil Based and UV curable Offset Inks, UV curable effect varnishes, oil, solvent and UV curable screen inks for rigid plastic substrates and oil and UV curable metal decoration Inks. We,at Flueron envisage to be respected and recognized as a quality conscious group and relentlessly work in providing their printers with a high quality and a consistent product. For more information, please email us at [email protected].

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/macfarlane-labels-ltd.jpeg
Macfarlane Labels Ltd
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/flueron-inks-p-ltd.jpeg
Flueron Inks P Ltd
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Macfarlane Labels Ltd
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Flueron Inks P Ltd
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Macfarlane Labels Ltd in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Flueron Inks P Ltd in 2025.

Incident History — Macfarlane Labels Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Macfarlane Labels Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Flueron Inks P Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Flueron Inks P Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/macfarlane-labels-ltd.jpeg
Macfarlane Labels Ltd
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/flueron-inks-p-ltd.jpeg
Flueron Inks P Ltd
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Flueron Inks P Ltd company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Macfarlane Labels Ltd company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Flueron Inks P Ltd company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Macfarlane Labels Ltd company.

In the current year, Flueron Inks P Ltd company and Macfarlane Labels Ltd company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Flueron Inks P Ltd company nor Macfarlane Labels Ltd company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Flueron Inks P Ltd company nor Macfarlane Labels Ltd company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Flueron Inks P Ltd company nor Macfarlane Labels Ltd company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Macfarlane Labels Ltd company nor Flueron Inks P Ltd company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Macfarlane Labels Ltd nor Flueron Inks P Ltd holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Macfarlane Labels Ltd company nor Flueron Inks P Ltd company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Macfarlane Labels Ltd company employs more people globally than Flueron Inks P Ltd company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Macfarlane Labels Ltd nor Flueron Inks P Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Macfarlane Labels Ltd nor Flueron Inks P Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Macfarlane Labels Ltd nor Flueron Inks P Ltd holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Macfarlane Labels Ltd nor Flueron Inks P Ltd holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Macfarlane Labels Ltd nor Flueron Inks P Ltd holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Macfarlane Labels Ltd nor Flueron Inks P Ltd holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N