Comparison Overview

Macfarlane Labels Ltd

VS

Continental Web Press

Macfarlane Labels Ltd

22 Bentinck Street, Kilmarnock, Scotland, undefined, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-17

With over 40 years of industry experience, Macfarlane Labels are experts in providing high quality Self-Adhesive and Resealable Labels to a wide range of sectors including food, health and beauty, household products, beverages and pharmaceuticals. Macfarlane Labels employs 114 people and supplies 350 customers in the UK, Ireland, Europe, the USA and Canada. Our team of industry experts have earned a strong reputation for the design, printing and supply of high quality self adhesive and resealable labels. Many of the world’s leading manufacturers of FMCG products trust and rely upon Macfarlane Labels as their labels supply partner.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 31
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Continental Web Press

1430 Industrial Dr., Itasca, 60143, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17

Continental Web Press is a family owned and operated commercial printer with over four decades of growth and experience, we are one of the top 10 privately held printing companies in America. Founded by Diane and Ken Field with a vision of being the best quality print and customer service company in the printing industry. Our commitment to quality is based on the understanding that hundreds of hours of work are required to get your print product designs just right. From sorting through hundreds of product photos then retouching, random proofing, creating composites all the while suffering through dozens of approval cycles only to compromise your quality standards on press. At Continental Web Press we are your quality partner as well as a link in your quality chain. We are willing to do whatever necessary to get your project just right. From making on-the-fly color curves to changing ink rotations and making touch plates to give you the best printed piece possible.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 105
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/macfarlane-labels-ltd.jpeg
Macfarlane Labels Ltd
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/continental-web-press.jpeg
Continental Web Press
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Macfarlane Labels Ltd
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Continental Web Press
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Macfarlane Labels Ltd in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Continental Web Press in 2025.

Incident History — Macfarlane Labels Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Macfarlane Labels Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Continental Web Press (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Continental Web Press cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/macfarlane-labels-ltd.jpeg
Macfarlane Labels Ltd
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/continental-web-press.jpeg
Continental Web Press
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Continental Web Press company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Macfarlane Labels Ltd company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Continental Web Press company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Macfarlane Labels Ltd company.

In the current year, Continental Web Press company and Macfarlane Labels Ltd company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Continental Web Press company nor Macfarlane Labels Ltd company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Continental Web Press company nor Macfarlane Labels Ltd company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Continental Web Press company nor Macfarlane Labels Ltd company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Macfarlane Labels Ltd company nor Continental Web Press company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Macfarlane Labels Ltd nor Continental Web Press holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Macfarlane Labels Ltd company nor Continental Web Press company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Continental Web Press company employs more people globally than Macfarlane Labels Ltd company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Macfarlane Labels Ltd nor Continental Web Press holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Macfarlane Labels Ltd nor Continental Web Press holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Macfarlane Labels Ltd nor Continental Web Press holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Macfarlane Labels Ltd nor Continental Web Press holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Macfarlane Labels Ltd nor Continental Web Press holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Macfarlane Labels Ltd nor Continental Web Press holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N