Comparison Overview

Macfarlane Labels Ltd

VS

Cedar House Media

Macfarlane Labels Ltd

22 Bentinck Street, Kilmarnock, Scotland, undefined, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.macfarlanelabels.com

With over 40 years of industry experience, Macfarlane Labels are experts in providing high quality Self-Adhesive and Resealable Labels to a wide range of sectors including food, health and beauty, household products, beverages and pharmaceuticals. Macfarlane Labels employs 114 people and supplies 350 customers in the UK, Ireland, Europe, the USA and Canada. Our team of industry experts have earned a strong reputation for the design, printing and supply of high quality self adhesive and resealable labels. Many of the world’s leading manufacturers of FMCG products trust and rely upon Macfarlane Labels as their labels supply partner.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 31
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Cedar House Media

10200 SW Allen blvd, beaverton, OR, 97005, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
http://www.cedarhousemedia.com

Here at Cedar House Media, We specialize in taking your projects from Start to Finish, We are committed to giving our clientele a full-service, premium experience every time and we love what we do! Our one-stop print & design house delivers exceptional products for a wide spectrum of clients and their businesses. Our graphic design team is experienced in helping create the final design product you are looking for. Once the design is done, leave it to our top notch production team print your collateral materials on our Xerox Digital Color Presses, Heidelberg Offset Color Presses and/or our Epson & Roland Larger Format machines for optimum performance and enhanced imagery, every time. Our Marketing Solutions put you in the driver’s seat to keep up with your current clients, and add more traffic to your business. Cedar House Media is dedicated to enriching your business and the lives of those who do business with you. Ready to order now yourself? Our exceptionally user-friendly website makes it easy for you to upload, print and ship your order quickly and efficiently. Is there something you need that you don’t see on our menu? Simply call our office and let one of our fast, knowledgeable customer service representatives help you find a solution--or e-mail us your inquiry and we will make it happen.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/macfarlane-labels-ltd.jpeg
Macfarlane Labels Ltd
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cedar-house-media.jpeg
Cedar House Media
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Macfarlane Labels Ltd
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Cedar House Media
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Macfarlane Labels Ltd in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cedar House Media in 2025.

Incident History — Macfarlane Labels Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Macfarlane Labels Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Cedar House Media (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cedar House Media cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/macfarlane-labels-ltd.jpeg
Macfarlane Labels Ltd
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cedar-house-media.jpeg
Cedar House Media
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Cedar House Media company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Macfarlane Labels Ltd company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Cedar House Media company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Macfarlane Labels Ltd company.

In the current year, Cedar House Media company and Macfarlane Labels Ltd company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Cedar House Media company nor Macfarlane Labels Ltd company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Cedar House Media company nor Macfarlane Labels Ltd company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Cedar House Media company nor Macfarlane Labels Ltd company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Macfarlane Labels Ltd company nor Cedar House Media company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Macfarlane Labels Ltd nor Cedar House Media holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Macfarlane Labels Ltd company nor Cedar House Media company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Macfarlane Labels Ltd company employs more people globally than Cedar House Media company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Macfarlane Labels Ltd nor Cedar House Media holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Macfarlane Labels Ltd nor Cedar House Media holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Macfarlane Labels Ltd nor Cedar House Media holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Macfarlane Labels Ltd nor Cedar House Media holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Macfarlane Labels Ltd nor Cedar House Media holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Macfarlane Labels Ltd nor Cedar House Media holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References